| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,26 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Prolif is an epistemological excuse for violence – their discourse wrecks alternative approaches – and trades off with structural violence==== |
|
2 |
+**Woods** 7 Matthew, PhD in IR @ Brown - Researcher @ Thomas Watson Institute of International Relations ~~Journal of Language and Politics 6.1"Unnatural Acts: Nuclear Language, proliferation, and order," p. 116-7~~ |
|
3 |
+It is important to identify, expose and understand the successful creation of 'proliferation' as |
|
4 |
+AND |
|
5 |
+realizes its ideological preferences while marginalizing other possibilities and co-opting subordinates. |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+====Environmental apocalypticism causes eco-authoritarianism and mass violence against those deemed environmental threats – also causes political apathy which turns case==== |
|
9 |
+**Buell 3 **Frederick—cultural critic on the environmental crisis and a Professor of English at Queens College and the author of five books, From Apocalypse To Way of Life, pages 185-186 |
|
10 |
+Looked at critically, then, crisis discourse thus suffers from a number of liabilities |
|
11 |
+AND |
|
12 |
+give up, or even cut off ties to clearly terminal "nature." |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+====Vote negative to reject the 1AC's enframing and reevaluate problematisation==== |
|
16 |
+**Cheeseman and Bruce 96** (Graeme Cheeseman, Snr. Lecturer @ New South Wales, and Robert Bruce, 1996, Discourses of Danger and Dread Frontiers, p. 5-9) |
|
17 |
+This goal is pursued in ways which are still unconventional in the intellectual milieu of |
|
18 |
+AND |
|
19 |
+constructive contribution to debate by those who are the targets of its criticisms. |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+====Representations must precede policy discussion – they determine what is politically thinkable.==== |
|
23 |
+**Crawford 02 **— Neta, PhD MA MIT, BA Brown, Prof. of poli sci at boston univ. Argument and Change in World Politics, p. 19-21 |
|
24 |
+Coherent arguments are unlikely to take place unless and until actors, at least on |
|
25 |
+AND |
|
26 |
+serious political wrangling." Hence framing is a meta-argument. |