| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,31 @@ |
|
1 |
+Interpretation: The neg must explicitly specify a comprehensive role of the ballot and clarify how the round will play out under that role of the ballot in the form of a delineated text in the 1NC To clarify, the neg must: |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Clarify how offense links back to the role of the ballot, such as whether post-fiat offense or pre-fiat offense matters and which comes first. |
|
4 |
+2. Clarify what theoretical objections do and do not link to the neg, such as whether or not the neg comes before theory. |
|
5 |
+3. Clarify how to weigh and compare between competing advocacies i.e. whether the role of the ballot is solely determined by the flow or another method of engagement. |
|
6 |
+Violation: They don’t – that’s CX |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+Standards: |
|
9 |
+Clash – |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+Voter: |
|
12 |
+Substantive engagement |
|
13 |
+1. |
|
14 |
+2. |
|
15 |
+3. |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+Prefer competing interpretations: |
|
18 |
+1. |
|
19 |
+2. |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+Drop the debater: |
|
22 |
+1. |
|
23 |
+2. |
|
24 |
+3. |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+RVI: |
|
27 |
+1. |
|
28 |
+2. |
|
29 |
+3. |
|
30 |
+4. |
|
31 |
+5. |