| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,15 @@ |
|
1 |
+===1NC=== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====The affirmative discourse represents an inherently unstable world needing short term solutions to constant threats. This form of security logic authorizes global domination and violence==== |
|
5 |
+**Chernus 01** (Ira Chernus. Chernus is a Professor of Religious Studies at the University of Colorado at Boulder. 2001. ~~"Fighting Terror in The National Insecurity State," http://spot.colorado.edu/~~chernus/WaronTerrorismEssays/FightingTerror.htm~~) VR |
|
6 |
+Just as the outcome of World War I sowed the seeds of World War II |
|
7 |
+AND |
|
8 |
+hope for a better, a more peaceful, a genuinely secure future. |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+====The alternative is to reject the affirmative's security discourse to embrace the insecurity of humanity.==== |
|
12 |
+Mark **Neocleous**, Professor of Political Economy at Brunel University, 20**08**, "Critique of Security", McGill-Queen's University, pp. 184-186, Published 2008 |
|
13 |
+The only way out of such a dilemma, to escape the fetish, is |
|
14 |
+AND |
|
15 |
+; it requires us to be brave enough to return the gift.143 |