Changes for page Westview Sudhakar Neg
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 17 added, 5 removed)
- Caselist.CitesClass[25]
- Caselist.CitesClass[49]
- Caselist.CitesClass[50]
- Caselist.CitesClass[53]
- Caselist.RoundClass[26]
- Caselist.CitesClass[55]
- Caselist.CitesClass[56]
- Caselist.CitesClass[57]
- Caselist.CitesClass[58]
- Caselist.CitesClass[59]
- Caselist.CitesClass[60]
- Caselist.CitesClass[61]
- Caselist.CitesClass[62]
- Caselist.CitesClass[63]
- Caselist.CitesClass[64]
- Caselist.CitesClass[65]
- Caselist.CitesClass[66]
- Caselist.RoundClass[48]
- Caselist.RoundClass[49]
- Caselist.RoundClass[50]
- Caselist.RoundClass[51]
- Caselist.RoundClass[52]
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[25]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,0 @@ 1 -Hey I'm Rohith. Message me on facebook(I might not see this) or message me(858-774-1149) if you want me to disclose a broken position or ask me about past NRs. If I don't respond, just check my wiki and check what could apply(I think this should be fairly obvious unless you read some generic util case). If my phone is dead, just ask me questions before the round. 2 - 3 -Also, I very rarely read disclosure theory so don't be worried about it. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-30 23:49:43.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -26 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Contact Info - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Contact Info
- Caselist.CitesClass[49]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,22 +1,0 @@ 1 -Part 1 is the Framework 2 -Proper human action can only be guided by constraints that are agreed to. This necessitates the sovereign to unify action. Hobbes 1 3 -The only way ... Commonwealth by institution 4 - 5 -Thus the standard is consistency with the will of the sovereign. Prefer additionally: 6 -1. Without the sovereign, each person becomes their own sovereign and attempts to put their own will over others until one sovereign is victorius. Parrish 2 7 -Derrida`s Economy of ... creator of meaning. 8 - 9 -2. analytic 10 - 11 -3. Constructivism is true—moral facts aren't "out there" to be found but linguistic categories created by humans for humans. Parrish 3: 12 -Derrida`s Economy of ... as extrinsic facts. 13 - 14 -Part 2 is the Offense 15 -Public colleges are the sovereign 2 warrants: 16 -1. Supreme Court cases have explicitly ruled. Buchter 73 17 -This theoretical mixture was applied in student-university litigation until Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education? was decided in 1961. Dixon held, generally, that a public university's actions were state actions and therefore subject to constitutional restraints and, more particularly, that a student must be afforded procedural due process prior to expulsion.1 " However, the state action doctrine in Dixon has not replaced the implied contract theory. Courts still view the student-university relationship as one of contract with certain constitutional protections required if the institution is public."1 Thus, there may currently be some limits on what the public university may demand from the student. For example, a public university may not be able to deny a student certain first amend ment rights." However, since the Dixon holding is limited to public institutions, a private university may be able to contract in such a way as to limit these constitutional rights."3 18 - 19 -2. Engaging in the sphere of public education constitutes state action. Dagger et al 14 20 -The second line of response to criticisms of consent theory is to argue in one way or another that the critics construe “consent” too narrowly. Thus John Plamenatz (1968, Postscript) and Peter Steinberger (2004, p. 218) have maintained that voting or otherwise participating in elections the state should count as consent; and Steinberger produces a lengthy list of fairly ordinary activities — calling the police or fire department for help, sending children to a public school, using a public library, and more — that constitutes “active participation in the institutions of the state” (2004, pp. 219–20). Mark Murphy and Margaret Gilbert have sounded variations on this theme by arguing, in Murphy's case, that “surrender of judgment is a kind of consent” (in Edmundson 1999, p. 320), or, in Gilbert's, that “joint commitment” is an important source of obligations, including political obligations (1993, 2006, 2013). For Murphy, surrender of judgment is consent in the usual sense of voluntary agreement or acceptance. As he says, “One consents to another in a certain sphere of conduct in the acceptance sense of consent when one allows the other's practical judgments to take the place of his or her their own with regard to that sphere of conduct. (This consent may be either to a person or to a set of rules: both of these can be authoritative)” (1999, p. 330). As the earlier discussion of her views indicates §2.3, Gilbert differs from Murphy, and others, in taking a joint commitment to be something that need not arise voluntarily. According to her theory, “an understanding of joint commitment and a readiness to be jointly committed are necessary if one is to accrue political obligations, as is common knowledge of these in the population in question. One can, however, fulfill these conditions without prior deliberation or decision, and if one has deliberated, one may have had little choice but to incur them” (2006, p. 290). Indeed, membership in a “plural subject” formed through nonvoluntary joint commitments plays such a large part in Gilbert's theory that it may be better to place her with those who advocate an associative or membership theory of political obligation than with the adherents of consent theory. 21 - 22 -Because colleges and universities are the sovereign, it is incoherent to limit the will of the sovereign when we willingly traded our rights claims to be protected in the state of nature. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-05 15:38:47.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Matt Delateur - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Tabroom - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -46 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JAN FEB Hobbes NC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Golden Desert
- Caselist.CitesClass[50]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,8 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 – Agamben 2 -Buchter and Dagger et Al Card from the Hobbes NC 3 - 4 -Analytic 5 - 6 - 7 -The sovereign can create law yet sovereign lives outside of it. The sovereign dictates application of the law creating a state of exception. A state of exception means that the law is not binding rendering the aff useless so you negate. Agamben 8 -.The paradox of ... an exception (Ausnahme). - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-05 15:38:48.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Matt Delateur - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Tabroom - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -46 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JAN FEB Agamben NC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Golden Desert
- Caselist.CitesClass[53]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,8 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 – Agamben 2 -Buchter and Dagger et Al Card from the Hobbes NC 3 - 4 -Analytic 5 - 6 - 7 -The sovereign can create law yet sovereign lives outside of it. The sovereign dictates application of the law creating a state of exception. A state of exception means that the law is not binding rendering the aff useless so you negate. Agamben 8 -.The paradox of ... an exception (Ausnahme). - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-05 16:45:12.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Matt Delateur - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Tabroom - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -47 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JAN FEB Agamben NC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Golden Desert
- Caselist.RoundClass[26]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -25 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-30 23:49:41.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Contact Info
- Caselist.CitesClass[55]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,8 @@ 1 +Interpretation: The affirmative must defend that all colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally proctected speech. To clarify, the affirmative may not defend that only military academies do the aff. Plans that limit a speech type are legitimate. 2 + 3 +Standards: 4 + 5 +1. Grammar – Colleges and Universities in the resolution is a generic bare plural. Eckert 16 6 +Second, “colleges” and “universities” ... known as “Nebel T" 7 + 8 +2. Limits - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-07 02:10:54.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Calen Smith - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lynbrook CW - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +48 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JAN FEB Nebel T - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Golden Desert
- Caselist.CitesClass[56]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,12 @@ 1 +The 1AC’s focus of granting free speech rights ignores the way businesses have used it to promote themselves within our capitalist society. Balkin 90 2 +A similar transformation ... the absolutist interp 3 + 4 +The AFF’s underlying assumption that citizens have right to free speech indicts the neoliberal myth that individuality should be protected at all costs. Tillett-Saks 13 5 +Yet there are ... quo or progress. 6 + 7 +Capitalism causes mass extinction. Farbod 15 8 +Lobal capitalism is ... of no return. 9 + 10 +The alternative is to engage in a class analysis and unite the proletariat. This is a necessary first step in advancing toward an effective revolution against the bourgeoisie and the capitalist system. The perm is impossible since the aff fails to achieve any revolution under its mindset, which only the alt does. Kissel 11 + 12 +Indeed, the underlying ... are equally inevitable". - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-07 02:10:55.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Calen Smith - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lynbrook CW - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +48 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JAN FEB Cap K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Golden Desert
- Caselist.CitesClass[57]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,5 @@ 1 +Hey I'm Rohith. Message me on facebook(I might not see this) or message me(858-774-1149) if you want me to disclose a broken position or ask me about past NRs. If I don't respond, just check my wiki and check what could apply(I think this should be fairly obvious unless you read some generic util case). If my phone is dead, just ask me questions before the round. 2 + 3 +Also, I very rarely read disclosure theory so don't be worried about it. 4 + 5 +Also, anything from the following wikis is fair game: Newport, Interlake, Green Valley, Sunset RB, Hunter ML, or Rancho Bernardo. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-08 18:29:37.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +49 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Contact Info - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Contact Info
- Caselist.CitesClass[58]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +I will not read PICs against you if you read a whole res aff. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-04 22:51:39.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lol - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lol - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +50 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Note about PICs - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 -- USC
- Caselist.CitesClass[59]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,6 @@ 1 +***I generally read this as a turn to the aff*** 2 +In the status quo, the alt-right isn’t being given the chance to speak due to students and administrators shutting down engagements. Burley 16 3 +While the Alt ... for their candidate. 4 + 5 +The alt-right exploits the idea of free speech to develop a platform and spreads white supremacy and racism throughout colleges. Burley 16 6 +A murmur began ... here,’” Spencer explained. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-07 01:59:14.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +51 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JAN FEB Alt Right DA - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +USC
- Caselist.CitesClass[60]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,9 @@ 1 +***I generally read this as a turn to the aff*** 2 +Minority enrollment is high right now. McGill 15 3 +Over the past ... largest minority group. 4 + 5 +Being open to racial insults and hate speech causes black people to drop out of school. University penalties are increasing black enrollment. Wilkerson 6 +On the campuses ... Dr. Ehrlich said. 7 + 8 +Campus diversity is key to racial progress, economic growth, and national security. Kerby 12 9 +The Supreme Court ... increasingly global economy - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-07 01:59:15.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +51 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JAN FEB Dropouts DA - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +USC
- Caselist.CitesClass[61]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,9 @@ 1 +***I generally read this as a turn to the aff*** 2 +Offensive speech doesn’t just come from students, it comes from professors as well. Berrett 10 3 +A Pennsylvania English ... entirely, said Nelson. 4 + 5 +Colleges allow racist speakers to lecture on campuses. Ellis 16 6 +Just over two ... universities, she said. 7 + 8 +Teaching racism instills racist ideas in students. Racism is not innate; it’s taught in schools. Kohli 08 9 +Unfortunately, what Eddie ... my young students. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-07 01:59:16.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +51 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JAN FEB Teaching DA - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +USC
- Caselist.CitesClass[62]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,4 @@ 1 +CP: The United States Federal Government ought to restrict free speech on public colleges and universities by extending Title IX to cover racial harassment in the manner that they did to cover sexual harassment. 2 + 3 +Racial harassment is legal and disproportionately affects minorities. CP solves by using existing legal framework, Titie VII and extending it to Title IX to be used on colleges and universities. Gordon and Johnson 03 4 +Racial harassment in ... evaluating—to continue. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-07 02:15:16.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +52 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JAN FEB Title IX CP - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +USC
- Caselist.CitesClass[63]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,30 @@ 1 +Public colleges are the sovereign Supreme Court cases have explicitly ruled. This outweighs: 1. Legal Studies determine beliefs that are held generally and reflect random sample population beliefs 2. The career path most similar to debate is the legal system. Buchter 73 2 +This theoretical mixture ... these constitutional rights."3 3 + 4 +Thus, by necessity, when removing restrictions, the state has to be acting on itself, or calling for a super authority outside the realm of the state. 5 + 6 +Your beliefs in freedom and democracy suspend the law as a benevolent force and drive states of exceptions. Brown 12 7 +Modern democracy’s normative ... hard to imagine. 8 + 9 +The 1AC places faith in current institutional society and assumes that they could solve for the oppression that they talk about in the 1AC, however this just affirms structural inequality and the paradox that the state imposes on its citizens. Agamben ‘8 10 +The reasons for ... of the nation-state. 11 + 12 +This quantifies the binary under the state: Bare life lacks the protection of rights, whereas qualified life has protection of rights. This arbitrary control over rights reveals the sovereign power of the state and it’s biopolitical control that ontologically excludes bare life. Downey ‘9 13 +Lives lived on ... suspension of rights. 14 + 15 +The sovereign can create law yet sovereign lives outside of it. The sovereign dictates application of the law creating a state of exception. A state of exception means that the law is not binding rendering the aff useless so you negate. Agamben 16 +.The paradox of sovereignty ... outside," an exception (Ausnahme). 17 + 18 +The alternative is to endorse counternarratives as a means of fostering new discourse. This demystifies state hierarchies and opposes the narrative that the state has imposed on us to control us. 19 +Gündoğdu ‘11 20 +In his analysis ... of the Law closed forever’ (1998, pp. 54, 55). 21 + 22 +The constitutive nature of debate is one that allows for multiple discourses, or polyvocal debate. We must be able to question whether it is good to believe in something, even if it has been proven rationally justified. Koh and Niemi 23 +For as long ... breaking those rules. 24 + 25 +The role of the ballot is to vote for the better debater who resists sovereign violence and biopolitics. Preventing biopolitical discourse comes first: Biopower is the dominant form of social control that has tainted microlevels of society and affected our discourse. I control the internal link to every epistemology. Pylypa 98 26 +Michel Foucault coined ... health, and sexuality. 27 + 28 +Any attempt to make political change or fight oppression requires an analysis of bare life. The state has the power to abuse its control reentrenching the biopolitcal grasp it has over its citizens. 29 +Edkins 2 (the brackets were in the card) 30 +At the threshold ... effective as such. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-07 02:15:16.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +52 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JAN FEB Agamben K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +USC
- Caselist.CitesClass[64]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,7 @@ 1 +CP Text: Public colleges and Universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech that criticizes the State of Israel except for all speeches given by Danny Danon. 2 + 3 +In the status quo, Danny Danon criticizes the United States and Israel for not annexing the West Bank and promoting settlements. New York Times 4 +Ms. Power, the ... disgraceful resolution,” he said. 5 + 6 +Squo solves: Danny Danon’s appearance on Columbia is currently trying to be shut down by student protests and organizations which can’t occur if the aff allows those restrictions to be removed. Nader 17 7 +Danon appearance at ... space for his racist arguments.” - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-07 02:15:17.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +52 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JAN FEB Danny Danon PIC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +USC
- Caselist.CitesClass[65]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,26 @@ 1 +Part 1 is Framework 2 +Ethical theories fail to connect recognition and motivation. This problem is a prior question to ethical deliberation. Linderman 3 +One of the ... of the moral agent. 4 + 5 +Two implications: 6 +analytics 7 + 8 +Virtues are constitutive of willing any action so it’s a side constraint on ethics because ethics must presume a conception of action for it to be able to guide action. Korsgaard 9 +on this interpretation, ... constitutive of her will. 10 + 11 +Because all action must contain an aim that seeks to achieve the ultimate good, the fulfillment of said purpose is Eudaimonia, or human flourishing, the constitutive function of an agent. Athanassoulis no date 12 +"Eudaimonia" is an ... and fare well. 13 + 14 +This also means that humans should adhere to all virtues else they fail to properly achieve their own goal of Eudaimonia. 15 + 16 +Thus the standard is promoting human virtue. Analytics 17 + 18 +Prefer the standard additionally: 19 +Rules are indeterminate because our usage can’t determine its constitutive content. Only a virtue paradigm provides the communal norms capable of expressing the content of moral good and accounting for the decision-making of normal life. Kripke 20 +Following Wittgenstein, I ...‘ought’ to give. 21 + 22 + 23 + 24 +Part 2 is Offense 25 +Restricting free speech allows for betterment of education for college students. College students are morally immature and still require experience and moral exemplars to learn from. Allowing free speech violates the virtue of “benevolence” or kindness. Posner 16 26 +As a law ... this boorish behavior. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-07 02:15:18.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +52 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JAN FEB Virtue Ethics NC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +USC
- Caselist.CitesClass[66]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,23 @@ 1 +***Note: You should probably read through the entirety of the Varden Article. There's a lot of uncut offense from that article that is usable*** 2 + 3 +Part 1 is the Framework 4 +Practical reflection is ... viability of constitutivism. 5 +Three implications: 6 +analytics 7 + 8 +Rights can only be realized through an institution that protects against violations. This means the state, as an omnilateral will, is necessary to reconcile individual claims to freedom. Neuhouser 9 +In the following ... state is necessary. 10 + 11 +Thus, the standard is consistency with the omnilateral will. 12 + 13 +Lastly, an agent is not morally culpable for consequences. Culpability is determined by your will. External forces, which fall outside the realm of the will, determine consequences. Hegel 14 + 15 +The will has ... in the purpose. 16 + 17 + 18 +Part 2 is the Offense 19 +First, Speech used to defame others coerces their reputation, which is an intrinsic part of humanity. Varden 1 20 +What about defamation, ... end for them 21 + 22 +Second, seditious speech is a contradiction in conception to the omnilateral will and must be restricted. The intention of seditious speech is to have to a right to destroy the will causing infinite rights violations. Varden 2 23 +To understand Kant’s ... is a public crime. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-07 02:15:19.171 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +52 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westview Sudhakar Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JAN FEB Kant NC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +USC
- Caselist.RoundClass[48]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +55,56 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-07 02:10:52.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Calen Smith - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lynbrook CW - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Golden Desert
- Caselist.RoundClass[49]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +57 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-08 18:29:35.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Contact Info
- Caselist.RoundClass[50]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +58 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-04 22:51:36.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lol - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lol - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 -- USC
- Caselist.RoundClass[51]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +59,60,61 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-07 01:59:12.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +USC
- Caselist.RoundClass[52]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-07 02:15:13.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +USC