| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,11 @@ |
|
1 |
+“Free speech” excludes the disabled body by predicating the concept of freedom and independence on spoken voice. The 1ACs support of speech marginalizes those who rely on other forms of communication |
|
2 |
+Ashby 11. Christine. Professor at Syracuse University, Degree in Leadership and Communications. “Whose ‘Voice’ is it Anyway?: Giving Voice Qualitative Research Involving Individuals that Type to Communicate.” Disabilities Study Quarterly. MCM. |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+One of the ... discrimination and violence. |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+The 1ACs defense of speech normalizes and promotes the usage of ableist language and constructs, which further subjugates the systemic oppression of the disabled body. The disabled body is subjugated worse as they are denied the access to rights such as the freedom of expression. which prevent them from being able to stop the normalization of such language. Zelinger 7/7 (Julie Zeilinger: a freelance author from the Barnard College class of 2015. Mic.com: “6 Forms of Ableism We Need to Retire Immediately” published July 7th, 2015. Accessed July 24th, 2015. http://mic.com/articles/121653/6-forms-of-ableism-we-need-to-retire-immediately)TheFedora |
|
7 |
+Nearly 1 in ... in our society." |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+The alternative is to conceptualize speech as encompassing more than just traditional conversation. Recognizing the importance and existence of non-verbal communication is key to deep understanding and inclusion of people with disabilities. |
|
10 |
+Ashby 11. Christine. Professor at Syracuse University, Degree in Leadership and Communications. “Whose ‘Voice’ is it Anyway?: Giving Voice Qualitative Research Involving Individuals that Type to Communicate.” Disabilities Study Quarterly. |
|
11 |
+¶ People considered to ... in nontraditional ways. |