| ... |
... |
@@ -1,22
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Cultural differences prove that there is no objective morality. We can only escape via social agreement. Leob |
| 2 |
|
-The argument from ... morality is real. |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-Rights can only be realized through an institution that protects against violations. This means the state is necessary to reconcile individual claims to freedom. Neuhouser |
| 5 |
|
-In the following ... state is necessary. |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-This means all frameworks must be consistent with I Law. Consistency with international law is the only way to keep consistent with the subjective characters of countries. Nardin |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-Any description of ... morality of coexistence. |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-Thus, the standard is maintaining consistency with international law. |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-Epistemically, obligations are derived from social contracts. Collier |
| 14 |
|
- |
| 15 |
|
-Richard Alexander (1979, 1987) has the ... our (collective) benefit. |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-I contend that I law negates. |
| 18 |
|
- |
| 19 |
|
-Hate speech is permissible under the First Amendment despite the exceptions. Volokh 15 |
| 20 |
|
-I keep hearing ...“hate speech” that I know of.) |
| 21 |
|
-I law banned hate speech. Matsuda 89 |
| 22 |
|
-The international community ... of eliminating discriminat |