| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,22 @@ |
|
1 |
+Cultural differences prove that there is no objective morality. We can only escape via social agreement. Leob |
|
2 |
+The argument from ... morality is real. |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+Rights can only be realized through an institution that protects against violations. This means the state is necessary to reconcile individual claims to freedom. Neuhouser |
|
5 |
+In the following ... state is necessary. |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+This means all frameworks must be consistent with I Law. Consistency with international law is the only way to keep consistent with the subjective characters of countries. Nardin |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+Any description of ... morality of coexistence. |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+Thus, the standard is maintaining consistency with international law. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+Epistemically, obligations are derived from social contracts. Collier |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+Richard Alexander (1979, 1987) has the ... our (collective) benefit. |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+I contend that I law negates. |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+Hate speech is permissible under the First Amendment despite the exceptions. Volokh 15 |
|
20 |
+I keep hearing ...“hate speech” that I know of.) |
|
21 |
+I law banned hate speech. Matsuda 89 |
|
22 |
+The international community ... of eliminating discriminat |