| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,28 @@ |
|
1 |
+I negate. |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Part 1 is the Framework |
|
4 |
+Morality must be derived from respect for the other. The face to face encounter with the other is the starting point from which we derive our ethical obligations. Grob |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+This face-to-face encounter...an ethical context. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+It is wrong for an agent to totalize the other since they do not understand them enough to do so. Imposing ideas onto people who may not want them to apply to them isn’t correct. Blum |
|
9 |
+The experience of ... answer for me |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+Thus, the standard is rejecting totalization of the other. I define the other as anything that ethics relates to. Prefer the standard additionally: |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+1. Epistemology |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+2. Ethical Theorizing: Moral cognition is a mental process, but ideas don’t directly refer directly to anything in external world. Totalization severs the link between your idea and an external person, so it could not be endorsed by an ethical theory. Beavers |
|
16 |
+If we can ... itself, be unethical. |
|
17 |
+3. Phenomenology |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+Part 2 is the Offense |
|
21 |
+1. Taking away an agent’s right to have nuclear power is totalizing. It doesn’t respect the other and imposes a set of rules on the other. Hovinhiemo |
|
22 |
+At the core ... ethics as responsibility. |
|
23 |
+Prefer this additionally: |
|
24 |
+A. Transcending Ego |
|
25 |
+B. Limitation |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+2.The AC totalizes the Other by assuming that they want nuclear power to be banned. Tribes such as the Navajo have reason to reclaim mining for themselves. Don’t inflict new wrongs before correcting past ones. Tsosie ‘15 |
|
28 |
+As President Shirley ... their traditional teachings. |