Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[16]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[14]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[16]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-03 20:18:38.243
	1	+2016-12-03 20:18:38.0

Caselist.CitesClass[14]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,66 @@
	1	+Qualified Immunity has silenced the disabled through excessive use of the “objective reasonable” standard. This sets up a system that validates ableist notions that disabled people are dangerous, excluding their voices from the legal system. Stefan
	2	+
	3	+The public still ... dropped the gun.
	4	+
	5	+Laws and courts are built on the notion of ablebodiedness, which creates divisions that distorts and excludes the voices of the disabled. Campbell 1
	6	+
	7	+Compulsory ablebodiedness is ... does non-disability denote?
	8	+
	9	+Thus, I advocate that we limit qualified immunity for police officers so that we can open up the space for the subjectivity of the disabled body.
	10	+
	11	+Limiting qualified immunity allows individuals to use civil litigation to hold police officers accountable, allowing them to interact with the law and court. Wright
	12	+
	13	+In order to ... to make it happen.
	14	+
	15	+Interactions with the law open up the space for disabled subjectivity. Campbell 2
	16	+
	17	+Disabled peoples’ interactions ... case is over.
	18	+
	19	+AND: The aff adopts a relational-cultural model of disability. By opening the space for the disabled to interact with the environment around them, we see disability as an evolution, creating the most effective method to break down ableism. Campbell 3
	20	+
	21	+There are many ... the Convention’s Preamble.
	22	+
	23	+The judge is in a position to be an inclusive educator, and has an obligation to open up the space for multiple pedagogies, or polyvocal debate. Koh and Niemi
	24	+
	25	+For as long ... of better debating.
	26	+
	27	+
	28	+The role of the ballot is to vote for the best liberation strategy for the disabled body.
	29	+Nocella
	30	+
	31	+Further, Artiles and ... of disability pedagogy.
	32	+
	33	+And, disableism entails the subjugation of oppressed groups as physically inferior. A social model of disability consciousness functions as a metalanguage that enables us to challenge constructions of the body of the universal individual as the dominant conception of normality. Russell
	34	+
	35	+It is disheartening... towards global justice.
	36	+
	37	+
	38	+Embodiment of the disabled is necessary to challenge the ableist assumptions underlying this linguistic game and to change the way we interpret and understand every aspect of debate. Lanning
	39	+
	40	+I’ve been thinking ... to be joined”
	41	+
	42	+This means accessibility is a multiplier for all our arguments since any external benefit debate may bring is made even more useful if disabled bodies have access to it. This means that even if util is good in an abstract and we should follow policies, if we allow for more accessibility, more people can reap the benefits of the framework of util or policymaking.
	43	+
	44	+Questions of participatory parity are meaningless without inclusive institutional norms. Berube
	45	+
	46	+Imagine a building ... of the name.
	47	+
	48	+This dependence on the disqualification of people with “disabilities” reinforces the false constructs of what “qualifies” as human beings, opening doors to humanity’s ontological extinction. It is the root cause to all forms of oppression. Siebers
	49	+Disqualification as a ... difficulty disqua
	50	+
	51	+Underview
	52	+Approaches to oppression must be grounded in material reality, not abstractions. Curry
	53	+
	54	+This gap between ... contemporary moral parameters.
	55	+
	56	+Policies need to be centered on groups suffering structural violence. Matsuda
	57	+
	58	+What does a ... to a just world.
	59	+
	60	+
	61	+If we force debaters to adhere to a strict interpretation of what debate is then the interpretation will be decided by the majority group excluding minority debaters. Warner :
	62	+More often than ... acknowledged to date.
	63	+
	64	+You should ignore their seemingly objective arguments concerning fairness in the debate space. Fairness is tangential on an individual’s interpretation of what debate is and this interpretation is always subjective and thus affected by social and cultural backgrounds as we are given very little confines to what we can be. Instead you should view it as a weapon for the majority to stomp on the interest of people not like them. Olson :
	65	+
	66	+That is, whoever ... objectives of others.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-03 20:18:39.938

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Tabroom

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Tabroom

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+16

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+5

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Westview Sudhakar Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Ableism AC V1

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Alta