Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[15]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[13]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[15]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-03 03:44:42.997
	1	+2016-12-03 03:44:42.0

Caselist.CitesClass[13]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,50 @@
	1	+I value morality. Agency is inescapable, two warrants. This supports constitutivism. Ferrero
	2	+
	3	+The initial appeal ... viability of constitutivism.
	4	+
	5	+This has four implications:
	6	+A) analytic
	7	+B) analytic
	8	+C) analytic
	9	+D) analytic
	10	+
	11	+Our agency dictates that violations of freedom are immoral. Ripstein
	12	+“Equal Freedom is a role of successful ... infinite freedom violations.
	13	+
	14	+An act is only permissible under agency if willing a maxim allows the action to be a universal law by which everyone acts. Maxims fail this test if they produce contradictions in the will when universalized. Contradictions outweigh: when universalized all contradictions become permissible creating infinite freedom violations. Engstrom
	15	+Now on the ... the same freedom.
	16	+
	17	+Only the categorical imperative solves contradictions in the will and upholds an agent’s autonomy. The categorical imperative is imposed by the structure of the will implicating that the will can only be the cause of itself. Korsgaard
	18	+We are here ...when one violates.
	19	+
	20	+Prefer additionally:
	21	+1. analytic
	22	+2. analytic
	23	+
	24	+Lastly, only intended harms are morally relevant. First is the distinction of relevance of action. Cavanaugh
	25	+
	26	+Good and bad ... firm philosophical ground.
	27	+
	28	+analytic
	29	+
	30	+
	31	+Part 2 is the Offense
	32	+I defend the resolution generally. If the neg wants me to defend a plan I will defend “Resolved: The United States ought to limit QI by removing the “clearly established” standard for police officers.” Just check in CX. I will adopt actors as well but you do not get access to DAs or T based off the actor if I comply.
	33	+
	34	+Contention 1: Tort Law
	35	+QI prevents essential tort litigation. Chen 06
	36	+The law provides ... assert qualified immunity.
	37	+
	38	+That violates universal law. We must be held accountable for our actions. Ripstein 04
	39	+All of these ... of the good.
	40	+
	41	+Contention 2: Constitution
	42	+We must follow the constitution. Two warrants:
	43	+1. analytic
	44	+2. analytic
	45	+
	46	+QI has no interpretation of our rights, which causes unlimited number of possible violations. Beerman 09
	47	+Pearson is another ... deciding on immunity.
	48	+
	49	+underview
	50	+omitted

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-03 03:44:44.614

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Tabroom

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Tabroom

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+15

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Westview Sudhakar Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+NOV DEC Kant AC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Alta