| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,68 @@ |
|
1 |
+I affirm and value morality. |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Part 1 is the framework |
|
4 |
+Agency is inescapable, two warrants. This supports the viability of constitutivism. Ferrero |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+The initial appeal ... viability of constitutivism. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+This means that insofar as normative truths exist, rational deliberation is an essential determinant of those truths. Thus, moral theories must be grounded in practical reason. Prefer this additionally: |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+Rational agents are able to create general representations to overcome desires. Rödl |
|
11 |
+We can distinguish ... singular representations appetite. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+2. Analytic |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+3. is the inferentialist alternative. Statements, whether descriptive or prescriptive, have reasons behind the way in which the statement was said. For example, saying the glass is half full is just as descriptive as saying it is half empty; however, they would imply different intentions. Therefore, our practical reason is the source of action since it allows us to transfer any statement to an action. Chrisman |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+What is crucial ... makes the statement. |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+Our practical reason requires that moral principles cannot allow our moral identity to be violated. Korsgaard |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+I believe that ... to have it? |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+Prior to setting one’s own ends, a person must have the means by which to set those ends. This requires that people respect the agent’s innate right to freedom. Ripstein |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+The core idea ... he benefits you. |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+Thus, respecting each other’s freedom means we must achieve freedom through non-domination. Pettit |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+The idea of ... affective and cognitive. |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+Thus, the standard is resisting structural domination. Prefer the standard additionally |
|
32 |
+ |
|
33 |
+1. Analytic |
|
34 |
+2. Analytic |
|
35 |
+ |
|
36 |
+Lastly, only intended harms are morally relevant. First is the distinction of relevance of action. Cavanaugh |
|
37 |
+ |
|
38 |
+Good and bad ... firm philosophical ground. |
|
39 |
+ |
|
40 |
+Second: Analytic |
|
41 |
+ |
|
42 |
+Part 2 is the Plan |
|
43 |
+Plan Text: The US ought to prohibit production of nuclear power. |
|
44 |
+Advantage 1: Domination of Tribes |
|
45 |
+ |
|
46 |
+Nuclear facilities and waste dumping create political domination over indigenous tribes. Spenser 10 |
|
47 |
+ |
|
48 |
+And in some ... waste storage sites. |
|
49 |
+ |
|
50 |
+Waste dumping constitutes severe health risks and creates an issue of tribal sovereignty in indigenous lands. Brook 98 |
|
51 |
+First, toxic waste ... as their savior |
|
52 |
+ |
|
53 |
+Only a prohibition solves. Nuclear power production occurs absent consent from sovereign indigenous tribes, meaning any production would constitute domination. The Navajo nation proves. Tsosie ‘15 |
|
54 |
+ |
|
55 |
+As President Shirley ... their traditional teachings. |
|
56 |
+ |
|
57 |
+Advantage 2: Imperialism |
|
58 |
+Western countries get to have nuclear energy, while we restrict the East from having it. Shirazi |
|
59 |
+ |
|
60 |
+Facts rarely get ... time to act. |
|
61 |
+ |
|
62 |
+Nuclear power has become a further tool of economic hindrance upon Eastern countries. Maintaining any system of nuclear power would only allow these harms to worsen. Gusterson |
|
63 |
+ |
|
64 |
+Noam Chomsky (1982) has ... of various kinds |
|
65 |
+ |
|
66 |
+The U.S.’s current use of nuclear power is a direct violation under my framework since the East/West distinction places too much power in the hands of one hegemonic state. Pettit 3 |
|
67 |
+ |
|
68 |
+The first, negative ... reducing domination among |