| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,46 @@ |
|
1 |
+Levinas AC |
|
2 |
+Part 1 is Framework |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+Morality must be derived from respect for the other. The face to face encounter with the other is the starting point from which we derive our ethical obligations. Grob |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+This face-to-face encounter ... an ethical context. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+This has two implications: |
|
9 |
+1. analytic |
|
10 |
+2. analytic |
|
11 |
+It is wrong for an agent to totalize the other since they do not understand them enough to do so. Imposing ideas onto people who may not want them to apply to them isn’t correct. Blum |
|
12 |
+The experience of ... answer for me"(97). |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+Outweighs other framework warrants: |
|
15 |
+1. analytic |
|
16 |
+2. analytic |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+Rather than reject the state, the state ought to change its obligation to the other. The state as an entity maintains its obligation to the other by maintaining its ability to pursue its conception of the good rather than imposing strict laws and totalizing the other. Simmons |
|
19 |
+So, unconditional hospitality ... anti-foundationalism and justice. |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+AND: analytic |
|
22 |
+Thus, the standard is rejecting totalization of the other. I define the other as anything that ethics relates to. Prefer the standard additionally: |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+1. analytic |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+2. Ethical Theorizing: Moral cognition is a mental process, but ideas don’t directly refer directly to anything in external world. Totalization severs the link between your idea and an external person, so it could not be endorsed by an ethical theory. Beavers |
|
27 |
+If we can ... itself, be unethical. |
|
28 |
+This has three implications: |
|
29 |
+1. analytics |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+3. Phenomenology: the perspective of your consciousness means directly “seeing” yourself is impossible. If you could do that, it wouldn’t be you perceiving anymore. Only being called by another agent can ground your experience of your status as a receptive to moral claims, so my framework is the only possible starting point. Levinas |
|
32 |
+ |
|
33 |
+One has to ... a profound utopia. |
|
34 |
+ |
|
35 |
+Part 2 is Offense |
|
36 |
+First, Restricting free speech is totalizing. It doesn’t respect the other and imposes a set of rules on the Other rather than letting it pursue it’s own conception of the good. Hovinhiemo |
|
37 |
+At the core ... ethics as responsibility. |
|
38 |
+ |
|
39 |
+Prefer this additionally: |
|
40 |
+analytics |
|
41 |
+ |
|
42 |
+Second, it is totalizing to assume that one narrative accurately describes the Other. Forcing the Other to adhere to another person’s narrative is totalizing. Powell 96 |
|
43 |
+ |
|
44 |
+An extreme form ... existing legal categories |
|
45 |
+ |
|
46 |
+analytics |