Changes for page Westview Sudhakar Aff
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 3 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[29]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-06 01:23:10.156 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Tabrrom - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Puget
- Caselist.CitesClass[24]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,34 @@ 1 +I value morality. When it comes to moral values, nothing is new under the sun. We can build upon our innate evaluative function, but never uproot it. Lewis 1 2 + 3 +The truth finally ... obligatory at all. 4 + 5 +Thus, all moral claims must be based on foundational beliefs that already exist, meaning moral claims cannot be grounded in external obligations. Otherwise, nothing can actually be obligatory. Moreover, only this coherentist approach to ethics takes the necessary holistic path that avoids infinite regress. Olsson 6 + 7 +The coherentist may ... never gets started. 8 + 9 +Therefore, all ethics that take a linear approach only result in infinite regress. Moreover, any innovation that claims to come from outside of tradition is self-contradictory. Lewis 2 10 + 11 +Since I can ... to move in. 12 + 13 +The fact that removed criticism is unfounded does not mean that moral progress is impossible. Building off of old traditions, progress can come from within. However, only those who live the moral life and are known to epitomize virtue have the ability to interpret and define the codes, which they practice. Lewis 3 14 + 15 +A theorist about ... Law was deficient. 16 + 17 +Thus, the standard is maintaining consistency with the teachings of moral authorities. This standard means that on each moral dilemma we appeal to what moral authorities specifically say, and not implications from one’s moral philosophy. 18 + 19 +Prefer my standard for three additional reasons: 20 +1. Epistemological justifications must be inferential because they require deducing normative principles by inference to features about the world. Non-inferential beliefs result in contradictions and are unreliable for moral judgments leading to skepticism. Sinnott-Armstrong 21 + 22 +A person S ... held by S. 23 + 24 +analytic 25 +analytic 26 +3. Appeal to authority is the only way for an agent to recognize the subjective limitations of their reasoning. Gadamer 27 + 28 +Despite the radicalness... to be true. 29 + 30 +Advocacy Text: whole res 31 + 32 +I contend that moral authorities affirm. 33 + 34 +check ollie sussman's wiki - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-06 01:23:11.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabrrom - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +29 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westview Sudhakar Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JAN FEB Testimony AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Puget
- Caselist.CitesClass[25]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,46 @@ 1 +Levinas AC 2 +Part 1 is Framework 3 + 4 +Morality must be derived from respect for the other. The face to face encounter with the other is the starting point from which we derive our ethical obligations. Grob 5 + 6 +This face-to-face encounter ... an ethical context. 7 + 8 +This has two implications: 9 +1. analytic 10 +2. analytic 11 +It is wrong for an agent to totalize the other since they do not understand them enough to do so. Imposing ideas onto people who may not want them to apply to them isn’t correct. Blum 12 +The experience of ... answer for me"(97). 13 + 14 +Outweighs other framework warrants: 15 +1. analytic 16 +2. analytic 17 + 18 +Rather than reject the state, the state ought to change its obligation to the other. The state as an entity maintains its obligation to the other by maintaining its ability to pursue its conception of the good rather than imposing strict laws and totalizing the other. Simmons 19 +So, unconditional hospitality ... anti-foundationalism and justice. 20 + 21 +AND: analytic 22 +Thus, the standard is rejecting totalization of the other. I define the other as anything that ethics relates to. Prefer the standard additionally: 23 + 24 +1. analytic 25 + 26 +2. Ethical Theorizing: Moral cognition is a mental process, but ideas don’t directly refer directly to anything in external world. Totalization severs the link between your idea and an external person, so it could not be endorsed by an ethical theory. Beavers 27 +If we can ... itself, be unethical. 28 +This has three implications: 29 +1. analytics 30 + 31 +3. Phenomenology: the perspective of your consciousness means directly “seeing” yourself is impossible. If you could do that, it wouldn’t be you perceiving anymore. Only being called by another agent can ground your experience of your status as a receptive to moral claims, so my framework is the only possible starting point. Levinas 32 + 33 +One has to ... a profound utopia. 34 + 35 +Part 2 is Offense 36 +First, Restricting free speech is totalizing. It doesn’t respect the other and imposes a set of rules on the Other rather than letting it pursue it’s own conception of the good. Hovinhiemo 37 +At the core ... ethics as responsibility. 38 + 39 +Prefer this additionally: 40 +analytics 41 + 42 +Second, it is totalizing to assume that one narrative accurately describes the Other. Forcing the Other to adhere to another person’s narrative is totalizing. Powell 96 43 + 44 +An extreme form ... existing legal categories 45 + 46 +analytics - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-06 01:57:59.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +30 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Doubles - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westview Sudhakar Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JAN FEB Levinas AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Puget
- Caselist.RoundClass[30]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +25 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-06 01:57:57.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tabroom - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Doubles - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Puget