| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,49 @@ |
|
1 |
+My cites don't copy and paste pls lmk if you want them. |
|
2 |
+Part 1 is Uniqueness |
|
3 |
+Modern politics and ethics are hopeless: The state is the sovereign right now and dictates the application of rights and the law, which affirms structural inequality. Agamben ‘8 |
|
4 |
+The reasons for ... of the nation-state. |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+This quantifies the binary under the state: Bare life lacks the protection of rights, whereas qualified life has protection of rights. This arbitrarily control over rights reveals the sovereign power of the state and it’s biopolitical control. Downey ‘9 |
|
8 |
+Lives lived on ... suspension of rights. |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+This form of biopolitical control that the sovereign expresses creates a zone of indistinction, where people fall into the grey-zone of the invisible. This legitimizes sovereign power and means that no legal actions are binding causing infinite violence. Edkins 1 |
|
11 |
+More than this ... and the profane. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+Part 2 is the Role of the Ballot |
|
14 |
+The role of the judge is to be an inclusive educator focused on including multiple pedagogies in the debate space. |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who resists sovereign violence and biopolitics. The aff endorses an epistemology of counter-narratives to demystify state hierarchies and structure of power which enables the fostering of new language. The judge as an educator has an obligation to reject biopolitical power and sovereign violence. |
|
17 |
+Gündoğdu ‘11 |
|
18 |
+In his analysis ... Law closed forever’ (1998, pp. 54, 55). |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+Reject the law a sacred and respected entity: perceive it as a childish toy. Play with it to eliminate the grasp the state has over us. Mills ‘8 |
|
21 |
+To return to ... even desire one.”17 |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+And this solves other Ks as well: a politics of playing with the law allows for a greater liberation strategy from sovereign control. Agamben ‘5 |
|
24 |
+The stakes in ... or made juridical (Benjamin 1992, 41). |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+Any attempt to make political change or fight oppression requires an analysis of bare life. The state has the power to abuse its control reentrenching the biopolitcal grasp it has over its citizens. |
|
28 |
+Edkins 2 (put away ur brackets theory: the elipses were in the card my author is quoting stuff from agamben directly) |
|
29 |
+At the threshold ... effective as such. |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+ |
|
32 |
+ |
|
33 |
+Part 3 is the Offense |
|
34 |
+Plan Text: Public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. Neg should check T and theory interps about the plan texts in CX. I will adopt plan texts so long as it’s reasonable to prevent the proliferation of frivolous theory. |
|
35 |
+ |
|
36 |
+ |
|
37 |
+First, allowing certain voices to be restricted forces those in the zone of indistinction to adhere to the words of those that are qualified to engage in discourse. This re-entrenches the biopolitcal control the state possesses by changing free speech from a negative to positive right. Powell 96 |
|
38 |
+An extreme form ... existing legal categories |
|
39 |
+ |
|
40 |
+ |
|
41 |
+Second, Free speech on college campuses is key to challenge U.S. imperialism and racism. Khan ‘16 |
|
42 |
+In the present-day ... on anti-colonialist expression. |
|
43 |
+ |
|
44 |
+ |
|
45 |
+Third, Student protests oppose biopolitical control and protest the dehumanizing conditions that force citizens into bare life. Delgado and Ross 16 |
|
46 |
+As students’ collective ... agendas, programs or pleas. |
|
47 |
+ |
|
48 |
+Colleges are doing their best to restrict protests. Kaminer 13 |
|
49 |
+A draft from ... Hall last week. |