Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[25]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[20]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[25]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-02-05 22:07:42.896
	1	+2017-02-05 22:07:42.0

Caselist.CitesClass[20]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,39 @@
	1	+Part 1 is Framework
	2	+Agency is inescapable, two warrants. This supports constitutivism. Ferrero
	3	+
	4	+The initial appeal ... viability of constitutivism.
	5	+
	6	+Three implications:
	7	+analytics
	8	+Our agency dictates that we ought to maintain a system of equal freedom. Ripstein 1
	9	+
	10	+“Equal Freedom is a role of successful ... in the first place.
	11	+
	12	+AND: analytic
	13	+
	14	+Using other’s as a means is the only constraint on your expression of freedom. Ripstein 2
	15	+The same right ... choice of others.
	16	+
	17	+Rights can only be realized through an institution that protects against violations. This means the state is necessary to reconcile individual claims to freedom. Neuhouser
	18	+In the following ... the state is necessary.
	19	+
	20	+Thus, no framework can develop rights claims without the state as an enforcer – my offense turns NCs and outweighs since only I provide the structure to actualize claims. Ripstein 3
	21	+
	22	+Kant’s point about ... of instituting it.
	23	+
	24	+Furthermore, philosophical argumentation necessitates a rejection of methodological solipsism, or the assumption that similar groups of people are capable creating a valid thought as it intends to make norms that apply across all rational humans. Engaging in argumentation means we cannot restrict any validity claims Apel
	25	+
	26	+Since the validity ... ideal communication community
	27	+
	28	+Thus the standard is consistency with the omnilateral will.
	29	+
	30	+Next, an agent is not morally culpable for consequences. Culpability is determined by your will. External forces, which fall outside the realm of the will, determine consequences. Hegel
	31	+
	32	+The will has ... in the purpose.
	33	+
	34	+Lastly, only the categorical imperative solves contradictions in the will and upholds an agent’s autonomy. This also necessitates a respect for each other’s freedom. Korsgaard
	35	+
	36	+We are here ... to choose a law..
	37	+
	38	+Part 2 is the Offense
	39	+it's what's listed under version 1

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-02-05 22:07:44.393

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Check Tabroom

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Dont Remember

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+25

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Quads

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Westview Sudhakar Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JAN FEB Kant AC V2

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Golden Desert