Summary

• Objects (2 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[1]
  • Caselist.RoundClass[2]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[1]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-09-10 18:05:45.16
	1	+2016-09-10 18:05:45.0

Caselist.RoundClass[2]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-09-10 18:08:20.503
	1	+2016-09-10 18:08:20.0

Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,121 @@
	1	+=1-off – Solvency Advocate theory=
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+====A. Interpretation: All plans must have solvency advocates - an author that advocates the entirety of the aff plan. ====
	5	+
	6	+
	7	+====B. Violation: they don't have a solvency advocate ====
	8	+
	9	+
	10	+====C. Standards: ====
	11	+1. Limits: This topic contains a ton of different plans with different authors. Each has different forms of specification and enforcement. Without a solvency advocate, I can't know how the plan works. Limits are key to fairness since:
	12	+a) Defined limits are key to making clash on substance that you can't shift
	13	+AND
	14	+education because generic arguments lead to non-productive and non-unique discussions
	15	+
	16	+
	17	+====D. Voters: ====
	18	+
	19	+
	20	+====Fairness is key to deciding the better debater, since it can't be done if one has an unfair advantage. Education is key since it's the end goal and why school's fund debate.====
	21	+
	22	+
	23	+====Drop the debater since the round's already skewed and scratching args off the flow harms us equally but not in proportion to your violation.====
	24	+
	25	+
	26	+====And use competing interps since I don't know what you think is reasonable and I'd always have a risk of offense.====
	27	+
	28	+
	29	+====And No RVI's since 1. We have a reciprocal burden to be fair in every round, don't vote them up for being fair if I was being fair too, and 2. Deters illegit args, else they'd get good at theoretically defending their position and winning back on the RVI.====
	30	+
	31	+
	32	+=2-off – IFNEC CP=
	33	+
	34	+
	35	+====Text: Belgium should join the International Framework for Nuclear Energy Cooperation.====
	36	+
	37	+
	38	+====It creates networks for nuclear power without having to establish domestic facilities, educates countries on the safe and proper use of nuclear power—solves prolif and warming.====
	39	+**WNA 15 ~~World Nuclear Association; Information on nuclear energy and the nuclear fuel cycle; August 2015; "International Framework for Nuclear Energy Cooperation"; **http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/international-framework-for-nuclear-energy-coopera.aspx**; JLB (8/8/2016)~~**
	40	+The International Framework for Nuclear Energy Cooperation (IFNEC), formerly the Global Nuclear Energy
	41	+AND
	42	+. Forum (GIF) and the Multinational Design Evaluation Programme (MDEP).
	43	+
	44	+
	45	+====Eliminates extra plutonium—solves terror and war.====
	46	+**WNA 15 ~~World Nuclear Association; Information on nuclear energy and the nuclear fuel cycle; August 2015; "International Framework for Nuclear Energy Cooperation"; **http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/international-framework-for-nuclear-energy-coopera.aspx**; JLB (8/8/2016)~~**
	47	+An early priority was seen to be the development of new reprocessing technologies to enable
	48	+AND
	49	+fabrication techniques that do not result in the accumulation of separated pure plutonium.
	50	+
	51	+
	52	+=3-off – Warming DA =
	53	+
	54	+
	55	+===UQ – Carbon Emissions Low ===
	56	+
	57	+
	58	+====Global carbon emissions are way down ====
	59	+**McKenna 15** ~~Phil McKenna, Boston-based reporter for InsideClimate News, master's degree in Science W "Global CO2 Emissions Decline in 2015 After Soaring for a Decade, Study Says," Inside Climate News, December 7, 2015, https://insideclimatenews.org/news/07122015/global-carbon-emissions-rising-decades-decline-2015-study-climate-change-paris~~ JW
	60	+The volume of carbon dioxide belched into the atmosphere from human activity this year is
	61	+AND
	62	+years but I think it's unlikely in the long run," he said.
	63	+
	64	+
	65	+====Nuclear power is key to preventing global warming- empirics prove.====
	66	+** Biello 13 –**David Biello 13, http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-nuclear-power-can-stop-global-warming/, citing James Hansen of Columbia University, How Nuclear Power Can Stop Global Warming
	67	+In addition to reducing the risk of nuclear war, U.S. ~~
	68	+AND
	69	+, director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University, where Hansen works.
	70	+
	71	+
	72	+====Squo solves. Nuke energy is orders of magnitude better for emissions====
	73	+**Pedraza 12**
	74	+Jorge Morales Pedraza, consultant on international affairs, ambassador to the IAEA for 26 yrs, degree in math and economy sciences, former professor, Energy Science, Engineering and Technology : Nuclear Power: Current and Future Role in the World Electricity Generation : Current and Future Role in the World Electricity Generation, New York.
	75	+Nuclear energy produces very few emissions of CO 2 to the atmosphere. If the
	76	+AND
	77	+of the fossil fuel power plants currently in operation all over the world.
	78	+
	79	+
	80	+===IMPX – 2 Degrees Celsius ===
	81	+
	82	+
	83	+====Meeting the 2 degrees Celsius change is key to stopping climate change catastrophe ====
	84	+**Mastroianni 15** ~~Brian Mastroianni, "Why 2 degrees are so important to the climate," CBS News, November 30, 2015, http://www.cbsnews.com/news/paris-un-climate-talks-why-2-degrees-are-so-important/~~
	85	+As the United Nations conference on climate change gets underway Monday in Paris, one
	86	+AND
	87	+carbon emissions enough so that the 2-degree threshold is not crossed.
	88	+
	89	+
	90	+===IMPX – Extinction ===
	91	+
	92	+
	93	+====High probability risk of extinction from climate change ====
	94	+**Meyer 4/29** ~~Robinson Meyer, associate editor at The Atlantic, where he covers technology, "Human Extinction Isn't That Unlikely," The Atlantic, April 29, 2016, http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/04/a-human-extinction-isnt-that-unlikely/480444/~~ JW
	95	+Nuclear war. Climate change. Pandemics that kill tens of millions. These are
	96	+AND
	97	+climate scientists agree that the same phenomenon would follow any major nuclear exchange.)
	98	+
	99	+
	100	+====Global runaway warming causes extinction ====
	101	+**Carana 14 –** Sam Carana is an environmental analyst whose expertise lies in environmental policy and sustainable energy. He also is a writer and policy developer. "Near-Term Human Extinction",~~ http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2014/04/near-term-human-extinction.html) CR
	102	+Global Warming and Feedbacks Is there a mechanism that could make humanity go extinct in
	103	+AND
	104	+. The poster below, from an earlier post, illustrates the danger.
	105	+
	106	+
	107	+=Case =
	108	+
	109	+
	110	+====Accidents are rare, nuclear power is the safest====
	111	+**Walsh 13** – Bryan, Writes for Time ("Nuclear Energy Is Largely Safe. But Can It Be Cheap?" http://science.time.com/2013/07/08/nuclear-energy-is-largely-safe-but-can-it-be-cheap/) CR
	112	+Is it safe? That's what most people — brought up on Three Mile Island
	113	+AND
	114	+save hydro and renewables, doesn't contribute to man-made climate change.
	115	+
	116	+
	117	+====Alternatives are worse ====
	118	+**Waldman 15 **- Susanne, PhD in Risk Communication at Carleton University ("Why we Need Nuclear Power to Save the Environment" http://energyforhumanity.org/climate-energy/need-nuclear-power-save-environment/) CR
	119	+What about safety? The accident at Fukushima after the Japanese tsunami in 2011 has
	120	+AND
	121	+-free power for keeping our world safe from biodiversity and climate impacts.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-09-10 18:08:22.219

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Michael Fried

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Lynbrook VV

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+West Ranch Won Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+SEPTOCT - Loyola R1 NC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Loyola