Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[32]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[31]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[32]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-15 19:34:01.295
	1	+2017-01-15 19:34:01.0

Caselist.CitesClass[31]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,69 @@
	1	+=1-off =
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+====Regardless of constitutionality, Title IX requires colleges to restrict hostile speech or lose federal funding.====
	5	+Bernstein 3 **(David E. Bernstein – George Mason University Foundation Professor of Law with a focus on constitutional history, "You Can't Say That: The Growing Threat to Civil Liberties From Antidiscrimination Laws", "Censoring Campus Speech", pg. 60-61,)**
	6	+**Given these constitutional barriers, public university speech codes were on the way out until **
	7	+**AND**
	8	+ban offensive speech by students and diligently punish** any **violations **of that ban. **
	9	+
	10	+
	11	+====Federal funding is critical for college operations, especially financial aid====
	12	+Pew 15 (**The Pew Charitable Trusts – compiles evidence and non-partisan analysis to inform the public and create better public policy, "Federal and State Funding of Higher Education: A Changing Landscape", http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2015/06/federal-and-state-funding-of-higher-education)**
	13	+**States and the federal government have long provided substantial funding for higher education, but **
	14	+**AND**
	15	+**, while state funds primarily pay for the general operations of public institutions.**
	16	+
	17	+
	18	+====Cuts to funding for higher ed and financial aid hampers college access, especially for students from low-income or minority backgrounds. This is a huge economic blow because college degrees reduce poverty, crime and a laundry list of impacts. ====
	19	+Mitchell et al 16 **(Report published by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities; authors were Michael Mitchell (State Budget and Tax), Michael Leachman (State Budget and Tax), and Kathleen Masterson, "Funding Down, Tuition Up: State Cuts to Higher Education Threaten Quality and Affordability at Public Colleges", http://www.cbpp.org/research/state-budget-and-tax/funding-down-tuition-up,**
	20	+**Years of **cuts in** state **funding for public colleges and universities have driven up tuition** **
	21	+**AND**
	22	+**the start of the recession will make it more difficult to achieve those goals**
	23	+
	24	+
	25	+=2-off =
	26	+
	27	+
	28	+====First Amendment protections extend to non consensual image distribution ====
	29	+**Larkin 14** ~~Paul J. Larkin Jr., Senior Legal Research Fellow, The Heritage Foundation, "Revenge Porn, State Law, and Free Speech," Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Oct. 1, 2014~~ JW
	30	+The Internet serves as a forum for publication or exchange of ideas, expression,
	31	+AND
	32	+in the eyes of most."165 The Court answered, "No."
	33	+
	34	+
	35	+====The chance for non-consensual image distribution is extraordinarily high given the amount of sexting on campus ====
	36	+**Reid 14** ~~Samantha Reid, reporter at USA Today, "Study says 70 of students have sexted, so how do they feel about revenge porn?" USA Today, May 15, 2014, http://college.usatoday.com/2014/05/15/study-says-70-of-students-have-sexted-so-how-do-they-feel-about-revenge-porn/~~ JW
	37	+College students are a key demographic affected by these laws –– according to a study
	38	+AND
	39	+young people that this issue most commonly affects that too can be problematic.
	40	+
	41	+
	42	+====This turns case – non-consensual image distribution causes chilling effect for survivors who are afraid to speak out and are silenced. ====
	43	+Citron 14 Danielle Keats Citron Mary Anne Franks 2014 "CRIMINALIZING REVENGE PORN" Wake Forest Law Review digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2424andcontext=fac_pubs
	44	+Free expression allows individuals to express truths about themselves and the world as they see
	45	+AND
	46	+constitutional rules, which would unnecessarily restrict legislative flexibility." 274 We agree.
	47	+
	48	+
	49	+====This is a form of misogynist psychological violence that causes irreversible damage to survivors . ====
	50	+Citron 14 Danielle Keats Citron Mary Anne Franks 2014 "CRIMINALIZING REVENGE PORN" Wake Forest Law Review digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2424andcontext=fac_pubs
	51	+Victims' fear can be profound. They do not feel safe leaving their homes.
	52	+AND
	53	+injury on individual victims, it constitutes a vicious form of sex discrimination.
	54	+
	55	+
	56	+=3-off =
	57	+
	58	+
	59	+==1NC ==
	60	+
	61	+
	62	+====CP Text: The United States federal government shall repeal the Patriot Act. ====
	63	+
	64	+
	65	+====That's key to increase free speech and foster progressive criticism of the status quo on campuses. ====
	66	+**Macdonald 03** Morgan MacDonald, Patriot Act stifles dissent on campus, Baltimore Sun, 11/24/03, http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2003-11-24/news/0311240117_1_student-groups-student-information-college-campuses //LADI
	67	+AS A COLLEGE student, I am acutely aware of both the legal and social
	68	+AND
	69	+its implementation. The destruction of our educational freedom must not be allowed.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-15 19:34:03.508

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Erik Legried

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harker KS

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+32

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+West Ranch Won Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JANFEB - Harvard Westlake R2 NC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harvard-Westlake