Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[31]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[30]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[31]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-14 18:05:18.224
	1	+2017-01-14 18:05:18.0

Caselist.CitesClass[30]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,57 @@
	1	+=1-off =
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+====Regardless of constitutionality, Title IX requires colleges to restrict hostile speech or lose federal funding.====
	5	+Bernstein 3 **(David E. Bernstein – George Mason University Foundation Professor of Law with a focus on constitutional history, "You Can't Say That: The Growing Threat to Civil Liberties From Antidiscrimination Laws", "Censoring Campus Speech", pg. 60-61,)**
	6	+**Given these constitutional barriers, public university speech codes were on the way out until **
	7	+**AND**
	8	+ban offensive speech by students and diligently punish** any **violations **of that ban. **
	9	+
	10	+
	11	+====Federal funding is critical for college operations, especially financial aid====
	12	+Pew 15 (**The Pew Charitable Trusts – compiles evidence and non-partisan analysis to inform the public and create better public policy, "Federal and State Funding of Higher Education: A Changing Landscape", http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2015/06/federal-and-state-funding-of-higher-education)**
	13	+**States and the federal government have long provided substantial funding for higher education, but **
	14	+**AND**
	15	+**, while state funds primarily pay for the general operations of public institutions.**
	16	+
	17	+
	18	+====Cuts to funding for higher ed and financial aid hampers college access, especially for students from low-income or minority backgrounds. This is a huge economic blow because college degrees reduce poverty, crime and a laundry list of impacts. ====
	19	+Mitchell et al 16 **(Report published by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities; authors were Michael Mitchell (State Budget and Tax), Michael Leachman (State Budget and Tax), and Kathleen Masterson, "Funding Down, Tuition Up: State Cuts to Higher Education Threaten Quality and Affordability at Public Colleges", http://www.cbpp.org/research/state-budget-and-tax/funding-down-tuition-up,**
	20	+**Years of **cuts in** state **funding for public colleges and universities have driven up tuition** **
	21	+**AND**
	22	+**the start of the recession will make it more difficult to achieve those goals**
	23	+
	24	+
	25	+=2-off =
	26	+Brackets are for offensive language
	27	+CP Text: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought to restrict non-consensual image distribution.
	28	+Murray 17, Christine. ""Revenge Porn" as a Form of Intimate Partner Violence." See the Triumph. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Jan. 2017. http://www.seethetriumph.org/blog/revenge-porn-as-a-form-of-intimate-partner-violence.
	29	+Therefore, revenge porn ~~non-consensual image distribution ~~could be considered both a form of sexual abuse—because it involves forced or coerced sexual exploitation—and a form of emotional abuse, in that it is used to humiliate and control one's partner. It is also a serious infringement of one's privacy that can have many significant negative social and emotional effectsfor people who are targeted. One of the participants in our research described the impact of revenge porn on her: "I am powerless to keep him from doing what he pleases with the videos he took of me having sex without my knowledge or consent." This quote captures the sense of powerlessness and loss of control that may accompany being targeted for revenge porn. Sharing—publicly and spitefully—the most intimate details of one's sexuality, sexual relationship, and private moments with one's partner has no place in a healthy relationship. Technology allows that sharing to go far beyond one's immediate social network and spread literally across the world in a matter of moments. Not only is this a violation of a person's privacy, it also can lead to safety risks, in that it can lead to stalking, unwanted sexual advances, and harassment by others, including strangers. Some people who are targeted even go so far as to change their names to protect themselves. Unfortunately, laws haven't yet caught up to technology yet in the case of revenge porn. As Jill Filipovic said on The Guardian, "Right now, the law and our culture are both on the side of those who shame and humiliate women for sport, instead of those of us who just want to go about our normal lives." Some actions are being taken to create laws to stop revenge porn, such as in Pennsylvania and Illinois. A bill may even see its way into the U.S. Congress. However, until the laws catch up, more actions will be needed at the individual, community, and national level to support people who are targeted, hold offenders accountable, and raise awareness of this important issue.
	30	+
	31	+
	32	+====First Amendment protections extend to non consensual image distribution ====
	33	+**Larkin 14** ~~Paul J. Larkin Jr., Senior Legal Research Fellow, The Heritage Foundation, "Revenge Porn, State Law, and Free Speech," Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Oct. 1, 2014~~ JW
	34	+The Internet serves as a forum for publication or exchange of ideas, expression,
	35	+AND
	36	+in the eyes of most."165 The Court answered, "No."
	37	+
	38	+
	39	+====The chance for non-consensual image distribution is extraordinarily high given the amount of sexting on campus ====
	40	+**Reid 14** ~~Samantha Reid, reporter at USA Today, "Study says 70 of students have sexted, so how do they feel about revenge porn?" USA Today, May 15, 2014, http://college.usatoday.com/2014/05/15/study-says-70-of-students-have-sexted-so-how-do-they-feel-about-revenge-porn/~~ JW
	41	+College students are a key demographic affected by these laws –– according to a study
	42	+AND
	43	+young people that this issue most commonly affects that too can be problematic.
	44	+
	45	+
	46	+====This turns case – non-consensual image distribution causes chilling effect for survivors who are afraid to speak out and are silenced. ====
	47	+Citron 14 Danielle Keats Citron Mary Anne Franks 2014 "CRIMINALIZING REVENGE PORN" Wake Forest Law Review digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2424andcontext=fac_pubs
	48	+Free expression allows individuals to express truths about themselves and the world as they see
	49	+AND
	50	+constitutional rules, which would unnecessarily restrict legislative flexibility." 274 We agree.
	51	+
	52	+
	53	+====This is a form of misogynist psychological violence that causes irreversible damage to survivors. ====
	54	+Citron 14 Danielle Keats Citron Mary Anne Franks 2014 "CRIMINALIZING REVENGE PORN" Wake Forest Law Review digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2424andcontext=fac_pubs
	55	+Victims' fear can be profound. They do not feel safe leaving their homes.
	56	+AND
	57	+injury on individual victims, it constitutes a vicious form of sex discrimination.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-14 18:05:20.580

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Jordan Durrani, Chris Castillo

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harrison RP

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+31

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+6

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+West Ranch Won Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JANFEB - DebateLA R6 NC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+DebateLA