| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,17 @@ |
|
1 |
+===Counter Interpretation=== |
|
2 |
+====A~~ Interp – The resolution lacks the modifier all when it posits the phrase Countries ought. Therefore, the resolution is not a universal, but rather an existential statement. This has two implications.==== |
|
3 |
+1 it means it is sufficient to affirm if I prove that there is a single instance in which a country ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power because it is proving the resolution inherently true. |
|
4 |
+2 the negative must prove in every single instance that countries ought not prohibit the production of nuclear power—it is not sufficient to provide a single instance in which nuclear power is desirable because that is not proving the resolution inherently false. |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+====B~~ Violation – I Meet ==== |
|
7 |
+====C~~ Standards==== |
|
8 |
+1 Textuality |
|
9 |
+2 Ground |
|
10 |
+3 Predictability |
|
11 |
+4Quality of debate |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+====D~~ Voters==== |
|
14 |
+Fairness |
|
15 |
+Education |
|
16 |
+Drop the Debater |
|
17 |
+Aff gets RVI’s |