| ... |
... |
@@ -1,26
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-=CP - Hate Speech= |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-===1NC Hate Speech PIC=== |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-====CP Text: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any Constitutionally protected speech except hate speech.==== |
| 6 |
|
-~McConnell 12~ Reed E. McConnell, Harvard Crimson. “Why Harvard’s Hate Speech Policies Are Necessary” The Harvard Crimson, April 18th 2012. http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2012/4/18/hate-speech-libertarians/ WWDH |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
-There certainly should … worthy of protest. |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
-====Competition:==== |
| 11 |
|
- |
| 12 |
|
-====1. Mutually exclusive; hate speech is protected.==== |
| 13 |
|
-~Volokh 15~ Eugene Volokh, “No, there’s no “hate speech” exception to the First Amendment.” The Washington Post. May 7 2015. Eugene Volokh teaches free speech law, religious freedom law, church-state relations law, a First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic, and tort law, at UCLA School of Law, where he has also often taught copyright law, criminal law, and a seminar on firearms regulation policy. // WWXR |
| 14 |
|
- |
| 15 |
|
-I keep hearing … terms of “hate speech.” |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-====2. Net benefits:==== |
| 18 |
|
- |
| 19 |
|
-====Hate speech normalizes discrimination; listeners imitate hate speech.==== |
| 20 |
|
-~Gelber and McNamara 15~ Gelber, K and McNamara, L 2015 ‘Evidencing the harms of hate speech’, Social Identities, April 19 2016. |
| 21 |
|
-First, the harms … to be sustained. |
| 22 |
|
- |
| 23 |
|
-====Hate speech has intrinsic harm, particularly against women.==== |
| 24 |
|
-~Horne 16~ Solveig, Minister of Children and Equality in Norway, “Hate Speech — A Threat to Freedom of Speech,” 03/08/2016, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/solveig-horne/hate-speech~-~-a-threat-to_b_9406596.html |
| 25 |
|
- |
| 26 |
|
-Hate speech in … against hate speech. |