| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,15 @@ |
|
1 |
+analytic fw |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+std: consistency with freedom |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+Seditious speech aims at destroying the state, not merely criticizing it; seditious speech thus aims at destroying the possibility of all freedom. This negates—the state must restrict seditious speech as a matter of public right, precluding private free speech rights. |
|
6 |
+Varden |
|
7 |
+ Varden 10 Varden, Helga (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). “A Kantian Conception of Free Speech” AMINTAPHIL: The Philosophical Foundations of Law and Justice 3, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-8999-1_4, © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 // WWXR |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+To understand Kant’s … is a public crime (6: 331). |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+This outweighs—it’s logically contradictory for the state to will anything that subverts its survival—it’s a constraint internal to willing, so it precedes even duties the state owes to its citizens. |
|
12 |
+Herman |
|
13 |
+ Barbara Herman. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Harvard University Press, 1993. |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+Ifn the fictional world of the CW … conditions of human agency. |