| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,26 @@ |
|
1 |
+FRAMEWORK |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Ethics must be first philosophy. |
|
4 |
+Analytic warrants. |
|
5 |
+The encounter with the other reveals the other’s vulnerability along with the other’s irreducibility. I can injure and even kill the other just as easily as I can share my food with the other, so I ask why I should value the other at all. But this question comes too late: the relationship through which we comprehend the other is the condition of all value. Perpich |
|
6 |
+Perpich, Diane (Associate Professor of Philosophy @ Clemson University). The Ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2008. Print. // WWXR |
|
7 |
+In Otherwise Than … reflection is possible. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+Thus the standard is respecting the other. |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+And, infinite respect for the other is the only way to avoid moral indifference that is the condition of possibility for oppressing another. Perpich 2 |
|
12 |
+Perpich, Diane (Associate Professor of Philosophy @ Clemson University). The Ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2008. Print. // WWXR |
|
13 |
+For Totality and … universe”—namely, me (77245; translation modified). |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+CONTENTION |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+I defend the resolution as a general principle. |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+First, free speech stages the scene of political contestation, allowing truthtelling that creates new forms of organization. Seitz |
|
20 |
+Seitz, Sergej (University of Vienna, Department of Philosophy). “Truth Beyond Consensus – Parrhesia, Dissent, Subjectivation.” Epekeina vol. 7, nn. 1–2 (2016), pp. 1–13 // WWXR |
|
21 |
+Bernhard Waldenfels is … forms of normativity. |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+Second, restrictions on speech deny infinite responsibility to the other. Pinchevski |
|
24 |
+Pinchevski, Amit (Graduate Program in Communications Department of Art History and Communication Studies, Faculty of Arts, McGill University, Montreal). Interruption and Alterity: Dislocating Communication. Dissertation. March 2003. pp. 216–222 // WWXR |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+Can Bartleby's situation … weight of interruption. |