Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[15]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[16]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[15]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-02-20 12:13:25.640
	1	+2017-02-20 12:13:25.0

Caselist.CitesClass[16]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,41 @@
	1	+Std: Consistency with freedom.
	2	+
	3	+analytics
	4	+
	5	+Abstract agent is embodied agent.
	6	+Farr 02 Arnold Farr Professor of philosophy at University of Kentucky, focusing on German idealism, philosophy of race, postmodernism, psychoanalysis, and liberation philosophy. “Can a Philosophy of Race Afford to Abandon the Kantian Categorical Imperative?” JOURNAL of SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY. Vol. 33, No. 1. Spring 2002.
	7	+
	8	+Whereas most criticisms … its emancipatory potential.
	9	+
	10	+Feminist theory requires a Kantian account of oppression in order to adequately explicate a duty to resist oppression. Varden
	11	+Helga, Review of Carol Hay’s Kantianism, Liberalism, and Feminism: Resisting Oppression. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/44059-kantianism-liberalism-and-feminism-resisting-oppression/ // WWXR
	12	+
	13	+Chapter 2 sketches the … to resist oppression.
	14	+
	15	+
	16	+Affirm. Restrictions in the status quo prevent people from acting on their agency no matter how miniscule the restrictions is.
	17	+Lambert 16 (Saber, writer @ being libertarian, “The Degradation of Free Speech and Personal Liberty,” April 9, 2016, https://beinglibertarian.com/the-degradation-of-free-speech-and-personal-liberty)
	18	+Many individuals in … matter how miniscule.
	19	+
	20	+This outweighs—no hindering a hindrance since arguments aren’t intrinsically harmful.
	21	+Anderson 6 — Amanda Anderson, Caroline Donovan Professor of English Literature and Department Chair at Johns Hopkins University, Senior Fellow at the School of Criticism and Theory at Cornell University, holds a Ph.D. in English from Cornell University, 2006 (“Reply to My Critic(s),” Criticism, Volume 48, Number 2, Spring, Available Online to Subscribing Institutions via Project MUSE, p. 289)
	22	+Probyn's piece is a … your opponent's ideas.
	23	+
	24	+
	25	+Hindering a hindrance requires a hierarchy of rights and doesn’t collapse to consequentialism.
	26	+Ripstein 9 (Arthur, Professor of Law and Philosophy at the University of Toronto, and Chair of the Department of Philosophy, “Force and Freedom”, Harvard University Press, 2009//LADI)
	27	+If you violate a … exhausted by them.
	28	+
	29	+Hindering a hindrance requires an external account of entitled freedoms. Only the Constitution solves.
	30	+Valentini 12 Laura Valentini, “Kant, Ripstein and the Circle of Freedom: a Critical Note,” European Journal of Philosophy, 2012.
	31	+As Ripstein puts … of our independence or consistent with it.
	32	+
	33	+Banning speech drives the root cause underground and leads to more virulent bigotry
	34	+ACLU 16 American Civil Liberties Union, “Hate Speech on Campus.” Accessed 3 December 2016. https://www.aclu.org/other/hate-speech-campus, WWLD
	35	+Bigoted speech is … of racist ideas.
	36	+
	37	+1 Interp – Neg gets advantage counterplans to test the intrinsicness of aff advantages and aff gets intrinsicness perms to test the intrinsicness of neg disadvantages.
	38	+
	39	+Mankins 84 summarizes
	40	+Michael Mankins, University of Kentucky coach, “Broken Beyond Repair Intrinsicness: Theory Headed for Collision” 1984 - Waging War on Poverty WFU Debater's Research Guide
	41	+The concept of … from similar conditions.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-02-20 12:13:25.863

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+All

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+All

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+9

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Walt Whitman RobertsGaal Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JF17 AC - Kant v1

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harvard