Changes for page Walt Whitman RobertsGaal Aff
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:41
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-02-19 05:13:09. 751 +2017-02-19 05:13:09.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,75 @@ 1 +=AC - Stock v2= 2 + 3 +==1AC== 4 + 5 +===Framework=== 6 + 7 +====The criterion is act-consequentialism. Two warrants:==== 8 + 9 +====(1) Pleasure is good and pain is bad.==== 10 +~Nagel 86~ Thomas Nagel, The View From Nowhere, HUP, 1986: 156-168. 11 +I shall defend … any further reasons. 12 + 13 +====(2) There is no morally relevant distinction between doing and allowing harm – it’s all about states of affairs.==== 14 +~Snyder 02~ Western Washington University - First published Tue May 14, 2002; substantive revision Fri Sep 21, 2007 - http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/doing-allowing/ 15 +In a nutshell, … is morally insignificant. 16 + 17 +====I defend whole rez.==== 18 + 19 +===Contention 1 - Backlash=== 20 + 21 +====Restrictions on speech fuel Trump’s agenda regardless of the content – his followers adopt radical stances as part of a larger reaction to the feeling that they’re being silenced.==== 22 +~Nichols 16~ Tom Nichols, “How the P.C. Police Propelled Donald Trump,” 1-3-16, http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/01/04/how-the-p-c-police-propelled-donald-trump.html Premier 23 +These brutish leftist … extinguish their dissent. 24 + 25 + 26 +====The link is causal – restrictions on college campuses spill over into politics writ large.==== 27 +~Tumulty and Johnson 16~ Karen Tumulty and Jenna Johnson, “Why Trump may be winning the war on ‘political correctness’” 1-4-16 https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/why-trump-may-be-winning-the-war-on-political-correctness/2016/01/04/098cf832-afda-11e5-b711-1998289ffcea_story.html?utm_term=.db9bc85e5b87 Premier 28 +“Driving powerful sentiments … structure for others.” 29 + 30 + 31 +===Contention 2 – Dissent=== 32 + 33 +====Strong First Amendment protections are key to dissenting voices in academia – feminism, CRT, and anti-Islamophobia are reliant on it.==== 34 +~Bernstein ’03~ (David E. Bernstein is a professor of Law at George Mason University, 2003, “Defending the First Amendment from Antidiscrimination Laws”, http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=489063)//SJT 35 +Ironically, protecting freedom … well to learn. 36 + 37 + 38 +===Contention 3 – Movements=== 39 + 40 +====Free expression is key to civil rights movements for racial minorities, women, and LGBT folks – campuses are key.==== 41 +~Harris and Ray 14~ Vincent T Harris has an M. Ed. degree and is a doctoral student @ LSU, Darrell C. Ray is a prof @ LSU, HATE SPEECH and THE COLLEGE CAMPUS: CONSIDERATIONS FOR ENTRY LEVEL STUDENT AFFAIRS PRACTITIONERS, Race, Gender and Class 21.1/2 (2014): 185-194. ProQuest. Premier 42 +Down and Cowan (2012) … and their views. 43 + 44 +====Historically, First Amendment and its principles have helped secure civil rights, fight prejudice, and move to equality – the aff is oriented toward ending racism of all forms but with a different method than censorship.==== 45 +~Friedersdorf 15~ Friedersdorf, Conor. (Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs) "Free Speech Is No Diversion." The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company, 12 Nov. 2015. Web. 09 Jan. 2017. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/11/race-and-the-anti-free-speech-diversion/415254/. Premier 46 + 47 +Over the course … and stigmatizing allies. 48 +He continues 49 +Let me underscore … widely shared ends.¶ 50 + 51 +===Contention 4 – Hate Speech=== 52 + 53 +====Hate speech statutes are compatible with the aff.==== 54 +~Tsesis 10~ ALEXANDER TSESIS*, prof @ Loyola Chicago Law, Burning Crosses on Campus: University Hate Speech Codes, HeinOnline ~-~- 43 Conn. L. Rev. 619 2010-2011, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c4c2/a881ffd558d28d2b0d0a738981c7211d85e4.pdf Premier 55 +In Beauharnais, the … prevent intergroup friction. 56 + 57 + 58 +===Contention 5 – Abuse=== 59 + 60 +====Speech codes empower white majorities to silence minorities.==== 61 +~ACLU 16~ American Civil Liberties Union, “Hate Speech on Campus.” Accessed 3 December 2016. https://www.aclu.org/other/hate-speech-campus, WWLD 62 +Historically, defamation laws … we'll be next.” 63 + 64 +===Contention 6 – Exposure=== 65 + 66 +====Banning speech drives the root cause underground and leads to more virulent bigotry.==== 67 +~ACLU 16~ American Civil Liberties Union, “Hate Speech on Campus.” Accessed 3 December 2016. https://www.aclu.org/other/hate-speech-campus, WWLD 68 +Bigoted speech is … of racist ideas. 69 + 70 + 71 +===UV=== 72 + 73 +====To understand requires internal critique of assumptions, but for us to even understand the critique requires that it start within the framework of our original for-meanings. Thus critique and development of the aff is important, but it must start within the aff’s general methodology, otherwise no engagement or development is possible.==== 74 +~Gadamer 60~ Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. 1960. (modified for gendered language) 75 +What Heidegger is … one's own fore-meanings. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-19 05:13:10.689 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Walt Whitman RobertsGaal Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF17 AC - Stock v2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard