Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[5]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[7]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[5]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-11-05 12:53:32.668
	1	+2016-11-05 12:53:32.0

Caselist.CitesClass[7]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,54 @@
	1	+FRAMEWORK
	2	+
	3	+I affirm.
	4	+analytic fw
	5	+The encounter with the other reveals the other’s vulnerability along with the other’s irreducibility. I can injure and even kill the other just as easily as I can share my food with the other, so I ask why I should value the other at all. But this question comes too late: the relationship through which we comprehend the other is the condition of all value. Perpich
	6	+Perpich, Diane (Associate Professor of Philosophy @ Clemson University). The Ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2008. Print. // WWXR
	7	+In Otherwise Than . . . reflection is possible.
	8	+The standard is respecting the other.
	9	+And, infinite respect for the other is the only way to avoid moral indifference that is the condition of possibility for oppressing another—means the AC controls the internal link to oppression or ends based NCs. Perpich 2
	10	+Perpich, Diane (Associate Professor of Philosophy @ Clemson University). The Ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2008. Print. // WWXR
	11	+For Totality and . . . universe”—namely, me (77245; translation modified).
	12	+
	13	+And, generic util turns and NC hijacks do not apply—the other counts as such, which means they cannot be reduced or aggregated in any ethical analysis; likewise, they cannot be ignored in favor of some abstract idealized system of rules. Perpich 3
	14	+Perpich, Diane (Associate Professor of Philosophy @ Clemson University). The Ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2008. Print. // WWXR
	15	+Two sets of . . . lives, or will live” (Arendt 1958, 8).
	16	+
	17	+In the world of politics, the other is joined by the third, which extends the self’s ethical obligation to the entirety of humanity. Since I am finite, I cannot relate to all of humanity at once; this constitutes politics as the necessary, original violence the self imposes with and on the other. Politics is a universalization of the infinite obligation to the other, since otherwise I separate myself from the concrete others in front of me. Simmons
	18	+Simmons, William Paul. “The Third: Levinas’ theoretical move from an-archical ethics to the realm of justice and politics.” PHILOSOPHY and SOCIAL CRITICISM. vol 25 no 6 • pp. 83–104 // WWXR 2016-7-21
	19	+The appearance of . . . , justice and politics.
	20	+
	21	+The universalization of ethical responsibility requires an agent to attempt to disburse justice—this justifies the liberal state. Its self-critical nature, always cognizant of the imperfection of its justice, is the only hope to satisfy the demand of the other. Simmons
	22	+Simmons, William Paul. “The Third: Levinas’ theoretical move from an-archical ethics to the realm of justice and politics.” PHILOSOPHY and SOCIAL CRITICISM. vol 25 no 6 • pp. 83–104 // WWXR 2016-7-21
	23	+
	24	+According to Levinas, . . . morally ideal state.69
	25	+
	26	+CONTENTION
	27	+
	28	+But the justice we have today is no justice at all—current qualified immunity doctrine is unequivocally a tool of totalization and violence—police eschew responsibility for the others they encounter and re. Greene 15
	29	+Greene 15 Greene, Linda Sheryl (Evjue-Bascom Professor, University of Wisconsin Law School). “Before and After Michael Brown—Toward an End to Structural and Actual Violence.” Washington University Journal of Law and Policy. Volume 49 Ferguson and Beyond 2015. http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1893andcontext=law_journal_law_policy
	30	+
	31	+A recent Mireille . . . official execution date.
	32	+
	33	+Excessive force is a unique case that presents the inadequacy of current law. Jeffries 13
	34	+Jeffries 13 John C. Jeffries, Jr. (David and Mary Harrison Distinguished Professor of Law, the University of Virginia.)* VIRGINIA LAW REVIEWVOLUME 99 APRIL 2013 NUMBER 2THE LIABILITY RULE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL TORTS* http://www.virginialawreview.org/sites/virginialawreview.org/files/207.pdf
	35	+Finally, special mention . . . against excessive force.
	36	+
	37	+We must fight this totalization. The other is a singular being, which is to say they are completely unique in their otherness as distinct from me. The address between myself and the other demands that I account for the other’s singularity. In the context of excessive force cases, the plaintiff cries out for a properly just reckoning, not merely one that subsumes the other under a previously decided general rule without any spirit of justice or concern for the other’s situation. Derrida
	38	+Derrida, Jacques. French Philosopher “Force of Law,” tr., Mary Quaintance, in Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, eds., Drucilla Cornell, Michael Rosenfeld, and David Gray Carlson, New York: Routledge, 1992, pp. 3-67. // WWXR
	39	+And so I . . . of the idioms.
	40	+
	41	+Rigidly applying the law without translating concern for the other’s unique situation into action when one’s sense of justice demands it reduces the other to someone who is merely calculable. Judicial precedent and the legacy of the jury as a fact-finding body proves that the courts must do more than merely programmatically apply a rule as if calculating a math operation; it must render justice without certitude, steeped in the specificity of the situation. Also means the ethical application of rules presupposes the AC framework. Derrida 2
	42	+Derrida, Jacques. French Philosopher “Force of Law,” tr., Mary Quaintance, in Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, eds., Drucilla Cornell, Michael Rosenfeld, and David Gray Carlson, New York: Routledge, 1992, pp. 3-67. // WWXR
	43	+
	44	+The undecidable, a . . . is not, applied?
	45	+
	46	+Thus, I affirm that the United States ought to limit qualified immunity for police officers by establishing that officers will not be granted qualified immunity in wrongful-death suits when their actions violate departmental training or policy. Steorts 15 clarifies the aff advocacy:
	47	+Steorts 15 Steorts, Jason Lee (managing editor of National Review). “When Should Cops Be Able to Use Deadly Force?” The Atlantic. 27 August 2015. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/08/use-of-deadly-force-police/402181/?utm_source=yahoo // WWXR
	48	+
	49	+It is astounding . . . or civilly liable.
	50	+
	51	+Taking the life of the other is the worst form of totalization—it’s an attempt to know the other in their entirety, as opposed to merely limiting an aspect of the other to a category. Not putting right what can be put right about the death of an other is the worst possible harm under the framework—qualified immunity must be limited to allow justice to apply specifically. Perpich
	52	+Perpich, Diane (Associate Professor of Philosophy @ Clemson University). The Ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2008. Print. // WWXR
	53	+
	54	+Here as elsewhere, . . . wish to murder.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-11-05 12:53:34.203

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+All

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+All

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+5

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+5

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Walt Whitman RobertsGaal Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+ND16 AC - Levinas

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Apple Valley