Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[4]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[4]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-04-29 01:00:40.703
	1	+2017-04-29 01:00:40.0

Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,31 @@
	1	+Only internal motivations have the conceptual capacity to motivate action, which is a prerequisite for moral considerations.
	2	+Katsafanas, Paul. “Deriving ethics from action: a nietzschean version of constitutivism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 83:3, pp. 620-660, November 2011.
	3	+While externalism captures…decidedly odd property.
	4	+
	5	+Thus, morality is a system of reasons we can all accept—mutual justifiability is the only way to solve the subjectivity of abstract moral theories.
	6	+Scanlon, Thomas. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard UP, 2000. Print.
	7	+Contractualism can also … in certain contexts.
	8	+Moral principles are adopted only if they can be justified on the basis of agent specific reasonable rejection.
	9	+Nagel, Thomas. "One-to-One’." London Review of Books 4 (1999).
	10	+The nerve of Scanlon’s … of any individual.
	11	+Contractualism forms the basis for a moral community. If the purpose of moral norms is to facilitate life and communal interactions in a society, then a contractualist account of reasons comes first.
	12	+Scanlon, Thomas. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard UP, 2000. Print.
	13	+According to contractualism, … these principles require.
	14	+
	15	+Contractual obligations are agent relative—reasonable rejection of principles can only come between two rational agents. This means we evaluate every moral consideration on a 1-1 ratio, not whether the aggregate of everyone following the principle would have a positive net effect. James:
	16	+James, Aaron. "Contractualism's (not so) slippery slope." Legal Theory 18.03 (2012): 263-292.
	17	+According to contractualism, …reasonably object to the imposition.
	18	+
	19	+Thus the standard is consistency with the agent relative principle of reasonable rejection.
	20	+
	21	+Students cannot accept restrictions relative to the college because the basis of public universities and colleges is the constitution, which the protection of speech. Buchter:
	22	+Buchter, Jonathan. “Contract law and the student-university relationship.” Indiana Law Journal, vol. 48, issue. 2, article 5, Winter 1973.
	23	+This theoretical mixture …these constitutional rights.
	24	+
	25	+Metaethical actualism means no fiat for counteradvocacies. Jackson and Pargetter:
	26	+Frank Jackson and Robert Pargetter, “Oughts, Options, and Actualism”, Philosophical Review, 1986
	27	+There are four considerations … referred to at the beginning.”
	28	+
	29	+And, contracts will always be made based on subjective emotions because that contributes to agent relative rejection.
	30	+Spranca, Mark, Elisa Minsk, and Jonathan Baron. "Omission and commission in judgment and choice." Journal of experimental social psychology 27.1 (1991): 76-105.
	31	+Subjects read scenarios …ignorant of the effects of not acting.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-04-29 01:00:41.836

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+all

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+all

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+4

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Valley Gilbert Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Jan-Feb AC 1

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+ALL Jan-Feb