Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[2]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[3]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[2]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-04-29 00:58:54.452
	1	+2017-04-29 00:58:54.0

Caselist.CitesClass[3]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,32 @@
	1	+To question the binding nature of moral obligations implicitly concedes the significance of inclusion in normative conclusions because all objections would be made in the context of shared rules. Apel:
	2	+“It is mistaken… a communication community.”
	3	+Apel, Karl-Otto. Reprinted in Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics by Jürgen
	4	+
	5	+Inclusion of all agents in the construction of truth is an ontological prerequisite to morality. Haste:
	6	+“Communitarian thinkers start… and historical context”
	7	+Haste, Helen. "Communitarianism and the social construction of morality." Journal of Moral Education 25.1 (1996): 47-55.
	8	+
	9	+No agent has greater epistemic access to moral truths because morals aren’t verifiable with empirical fact. Markovitz:
	10	+“Relatedly, internalism about… of us are).”
	11	+Markovits, Julia. Moral reason. Oxford University Press, 2014.
	12	+
	13	+Additionally, only the analysis of intent of an action includes all perceptions into the construction of truths. Tannenbaum:
	14	+“When it comes… had occurred unintentionally.”
	15	+Tannenbaum, Melanie. ""But I Didn't Mean It!" Why It's so Hard to Prioritize Impacts over Intents." Scientific American Global RSS. N.p., 14 Oct. 2013. Web. 08 Sept. 2015.
	16	+
	17	+Speech codes entrench a massive divide within society and push society to manifest into one in which nobody is included in the manifestation of truth— historically proven. Haiman:
	18	+“Placing limitations on… increased its circulation.”
	19	+Haiman, Franklyn. “The Remedy is More Speech.” The American Prospect. Summer 1991.
	20	+
	21	+And, even when speech codes do target those with oppressive ideology, they are coopted and used as a tool of exclusion. Cammaerts
	22	+“However, in a… causes of it.”
	23	+Bart Cammaerts ‘9, London School of Economics and Political Science, England, 11-2009, "Radical pluralism and free speech in online public spaces," International Journal of Cultural Studies
	24	+
	25	+Further, the neg embraces an overall maxim in which individuals are excluded from moral projects- means only the affirmative has a risk of epistemic validity. Greenawalt:
	26	+“Mill says that… to be tolerated.”
	27	+Greenawalt, Kent. "Free speech justifications." Columbia Law Review 89.1 (1989): 119-155.
	28	+"Hate Speech On Campus". American Civil Liberties Union. N. p., 2016. Web. 4 Dec. 2016.
	29	+
	30	+Restrictions establish conditions of which speech is acceptable which is exclusionary by virtue as it requires a declaration by one agent of which speech applies. ACLU:
	31	+“Because the ultimate… we'll be next”
	32	+"Hate Speech On Campus". American Civil Liberties Union. N. p., 2016. Web. 4 Dec. 2016.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-04-29 00:58:54.609

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+all

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+all

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+4

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Valley Gilbert Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Jan-Feb AC 4

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+ALL Jan-Feb