Changes for page Valley Foley Neg
Summary
-
Objects (7 modified, 0 added, 3 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[0]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,11 +1,53 @@ 1 -Revenge porn is protected speech. 2 - Humbach, John A. "The Constitution and Revenge Porn." Pace Law Review 35.1 (2015). 3 -“The inherent repulsiveness …viewpoint, or the speaker.” 4 - 5 -Revenge porn is fundamentally oppressive. 6 -Filipovic, Jill. "'Revenge Porn' Is about Degrading Women Sexually and Professionally." The Guardian, 28 Jan. 2013. Web. 7 -“On revenge porn sites… reputations of young women.” 8 - 9 -Revenge porn totalizes the identities of those targeted, defining them to the world and leaving them literally helpless to respond. 10 -Murray, Christine and Allison Crowe. “‘Revenge porn as a form of intimate partner violence.” See the Triumph, April 6, 2014. Web. 11 -“One woman of the …, and raise awareness of this important issue.” 1 +Alasdair Macintyre, After Virtue, 1981 2 +Armacost, Barbara. “Organizational culture and police misconduct.” The George Washington Law Review, vol. 72, no. 453, 2004. 3 +Armacost, Barbara. “Organizational culture and police misconduct.” The George Washington Law Review, vol. 72, no. 453, 2004. 4 +Bevir 99 ( Mark “Foucault and Critique: Deploying Agency Against Autonomy” KNP) 5 +Bevir 99 ( Mark “Foucault and Critique: Deploying Agency Against Autonomy” KNP) 6 +Carbado, Devon and Patrick Rock. “What exposes African Americans to police violence?” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, vol. 51, 2016. 7 +Carbado, Devon and Patrick Rock. “What exposes African Americans to police violence?” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, vol. 51, 2016. 8 +Chatalain, George. “Induction and the problem of the external world.” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 49, no. 19, September 11, 1952, pp. 601-607. 9 +Coburn, Robert C. Quals “A defense of ethical noncognitivism.” Philosophical Studies, vol. 62, no. 1, April 1991, pp. 67-80. 10 +Dr. Dominic Corva, Professor in Department of Geography at University of Washington, “Biopower and the Militarization of the Police Function”) https://www.academia.edu/298029/Biopower_and_the_Militarization_of_the_Police_Function || LB 11 +Eyre, Pete. "There Are No Good Cops | Cop Block." Cop Block. N.p., 01 Jan. 2014. Web. 03 Nov. 2016. 12 +Gonick, Lev and Isaac Prilleltensky. “Polities change, oppression remains: on the psychology and politics of oppression.” Political Psychology, vol. 17, no. 1, March 1996, pp. 127-148. 13 +Gonick, Lev and Isaac Prilleltensky. “Polities change, oppression remains: on the psychology and politics of oppression.” Political Psychology, vol. 17, no. 1, March 1996, pp. 127-148. 14 +Gottileb Paula Gottileb Professor of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin Madison. “Aristotle on Non-contradiction.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 26 January 2011. 15 +Heyman, Steven J. "THE FIRST DUTY OF GOVERNMENT: PROTECTION, LIBERTY AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT." Duke University, n.d. Web. 28 Oct. 16. 16 +http://archive.sgir.eu/uploads/Grayson-graysonsgir.pdf 17 +Huemer, Michael. The Problem of Political Authority. New York: Springer, October 2012. 18 +Huemer, Michael. The Problem of Political Authority. New York: Springer, October 2012. 19 +James Bernauer, philosophy professor, Boston College, 1990 (MICHAEL FOUCAULT'S FORCE OF FLIGHT: TOWARD AN ETHICS OF THOUGHT, pp. 141-2) 20 +Kennedy, Duncan (Professor of General Jurisprudence at the Harvard University Law School). "Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication." Harvard Law Review 89 (1976): p. 1685-1778. 21 +Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 22 +Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 23 +Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 24 +Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 25 +Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 26 +Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 27 +Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 28 +Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 29 +Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 30 +Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 31 +Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 32 +Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 33 +Korsgaard, Christine. “Creating The Kingdom of Ends: Reciprocity and Responsibility in Personal Relations.” (p. 315). 34 +Lindeman, Kathryn M. (AB, Mount Holyoke College, 2005; PhD in philosophy, University of Pittsburgh) “Grounding constitutivism,” 2014. 35 +Lucas J.R. Lucas Professor of Philosophy Emeritus, University of Oxford. Reason and Reality. Ria University Press, 2009. Print. *Gendered language modified* 36 +Madar, Chase. “Why it’s impossible to indict a cop.” The Nation, November 25, 2014. 37 +Madar, Chase. “Why it’s impossible to indict a cop.” The Nation, November 25, 2014. 38 +Millgram, Elijah, "Practical Reason and the Structure of Actions," The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta. 39 +N O B R E A T H I N G 40 +Negate." Def. 1. Merriam Webser. Web. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/negate. 41 +Pinker, Steven. "Why Violence Is Vanishing." WSJ. N.p., 23 Sept. 2011. Web. 04 Nov. 2016. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424053111904106704576583203589408180 42 +Richard, ATandT Professor of Law – Texas Tech University School of Law, and Afsheen John, Professor – William Mitchell College of Law; Assistant General Counsel – Central Intelligence Agency, “Due Process and Targeted Killing of Terrorists,” Cardozo Law Review, November, 32 Cardozo L. Rev. 405, Lexis 43 +Rosen, Michael. “A qualified defense: in support of the doctrine of qualified immunity in excessive force cases, with some suggestions for its improvement.” Golden Gate University Law Review, vol. 35, no. 2, 2005. 44 +Schenwar, Maya et al. Who Do You Serve, Who Do You Protect?: Police Violence and Resistance in the United States. Haymarket Books, 2016. 45 +Schenwar, Maya et al. Who Do You Serve, Who Do You Protect?: Police Violence and Resistance in the United States. Haymarket Books, 2016. 46 +Schwartz, Joanna. NYU Law Review (2014): n. pag. 2014. Web. 20 Oct. 2016 47 +Shoemaker, David. "Rationality Is Permissibility." 'PEA Soup' Responsibility in the Margins, 25 July 2015. Web. 22 Oct. 2015. 48 +Smith, Mychal Denzel. "Abolish the Police. Instead, Let's Have Full Social, Economic, and Political Equality." The Nation. N.p., 29 June 2015. Web. 03 Nov. 2016.\ 49 +Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collége de France, 1975-76 p.258 50 +Street, Sharon. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value.” Philosophical Studies January 2006. Pgs 118-121 51 +Trent H., St. John’s U, Neoliberalism, Governmentality, and Ethics, Foucault Studies No6 Feb 2009) LA 52 +Where is Now? The Paradox of The Present. NPR July 26 2011 53 +Zapf, Christian, and Eben Moglen. "LINGUISTIC INDETERMINACY AND THE RULE OF LAW: ON THE PERILS OF MISUNDERSTANDING WITTGENSTEIN." Lexis Nexis. Georgetown Law Journal, Feb. 1996. Web. 20 Oct. 2015. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -201 7-04-2611:04:04.01 +2016-11-28 17:19:32.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Any1 +McGinnis, David - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -A ny1 +ALL - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 11 +2 - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - JanFebNeg11 +Neg Cites November December - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Any1 +Big Moat Palooza
- Caselist.CitesClass[1]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,23 +1,0 @@ 1 -Ethical obligations derive from interactions among moral agents. 2 -Korsgard, Christine. “Creating the kingdom of ends: reciprocity and responsibility in personal relations.” Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 6, 1992, pp. 305-332. 3 - 4 -“The relations of reciprocity ;… the other responsible.” 5 -Korsgard, Christine. “Creating the kingdom of ends: reciprocity and responsibility in personal relations.” Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 6, 1992, pp. 305-332. 6 - 7 -Thus our ethical duties arise from mutually voluntary relations of reciprocity, and these agreements uniquely generate moral obligations. 8 -Gauthier, David (Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh). Morals by Agreement. (1986). 9 -“A contractarian theory … or morally neutral, base.” 10 - 11 -Thus the standard is consistency with contractual obligation. 12 - 13 -First, “protected speech” is subject to restriction in pursuit of vital interests. Kairys: 14 -Kairys, David. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. ReadHowYouWant.com, November 2010. 15 -“Speech is first categorized …he ‘strict scrutiny’ standard.” 16 - 17 -And, protected speech is subject to reasonable restriction in college classrooms for the purposes of education. The 11th Circuit of the US Court of Appeals: 18 -U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Bishop v. Aronov, 926 F.2d 1066, 1991. Ellipses in original. 19 -“Nevertheless, a correct legal analysis must … Dr. Bishop’s classroom is not an open forum.” 20 - 21 -Thus, colleges are contractually obligated to impose content-based restrictions. Russo: 22 -Russo, Charles. Handbook of Comparative Higher Education Law, RandL Education, 2013. 23 -“Students at both public … standards of teaching.” - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-26 11:09:10.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Valley Foley Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Jan Feb Neg 2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +2,7 @@ 1 -That means we use a contractarian system of mutual restraint. Gauthier: 2 2 Gauthier, David P. Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986. Print. 3 -Moral principles are …moral dimension in their affairs. 4 4 5 -The rest of the case is analytic. 3 +Humbach, John A. "The Constitution and Revenge Porn." Pace Law Review 35.1 (2015). 4 + 5 +Filipovic, Jill. "'Revenge Porn' Is about Degrading Women Sexually and Professionally." The Guardian, 28 Jan. 2013. Web. 6 + 7 +Murray, Christine and Allison Crowe. “‘Revenge porn as a form of intimate partner violence.” See the Triumph, April 6, 2014. Web. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -201 7-04-2611:13:20.01 +2016-12-17 21:28:11.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Any1 +Brundage, Rick - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Any1 +University AG - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Jan FebNeg31 +Blake R3 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Any1 +Blake
- Caselist.CitesClass[3]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,15 +1,11 @@ 1 -First, what is constitutive of an agent provides the needed context to determine what it means to be good or bad. Geach: 2 -“There is no… good deer-stalker” 3 -Geach, P. T. "Good and Evil." Analysis 17.2 (1956): 33-42. Web. 1 +Korsgard, Christine. “Creating the kingdom of ends: reciprocity and responsibility in personal relations.” Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 6, 1992, pp. 305-332. 4 4 5 -Second, constitutivism is inescapable and generates non-optional norms- means agents can’t escape constitutive duties. Katsafanas: 6 -“So what’s special… practicality and queerness.” 7 -Thus the standard is consistency with the constitutive nature of the agent of action. 3 +Gauthier, David (Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh). Morals by Agreement. (1986). 8 8 9 - First,protectedspeechis subjecttoreasonable restriction incollege classroomsforthepurposesof education. The11thCircuitof theUS CourtofAppeals notes:10 - “Nevertheless, a correct… an open forum”5 +Kairys, David. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. ReadHowYouWant.com, November 2010. 6 + 11 11 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Bishop v. Aronov, 926 F.2d 1066, 1991. Ellipses in original. 12 12 13 -Thus, colleges are contractually obligated to impose content-based restrictions. Russo: 14 -“Students at both… standards of teaching.” 15 15 Russo, Charles. Handbook of Comparative Higher Education Law, RandL Education, 2013. 10 + 11 +Fields, Cheryl. “A morale dilemma – black professors on white campuses – includes related article on mentorship programs for black faculty – Cover Story” June 23, 2007 Diverse Issues in Higher Education. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -201 7-04-3023:48:08.01 +2016-12-18 19:33:26.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Any1 +Panel - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -A ny1 +Dulles AW - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 41 +Semis - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Jan FebNeg 41 +Blake Semis - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Any1 +Blake
- Caselist.CitesClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,17 +1,0 @@ 1 -If we accept contradictory statements, language fails to make sense, making the resolution false. Lucas: 2 -"But why should...become just babble" 3 -J.R. Lucas Professor of Philosophy Emeritus, University of Oxford. Reason and Reality. Ria University Press, 2009. Print. *Gendered language modified* 4 - 5 -It’s impossible to argue against non-contradiction, which is true a priori and stops infinite regress. Gottileb: 6 -"Aristotle explains that... is similarly misguided" 7 -Paula Gottileb Professor of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin Madison. “Aristotle on Non-contradiction.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 26 January 2011. 8 - 9 -THUS, the standard is consistency with the epistemological principle of non-contradiction. 10 - 11 -“Protected speech” is by definition subject to restriction in pursuit of vital interests. Kairys: 12 -"Speech is first...strict scrutiny’ standard" 13 -Kairys, David. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. ReadHowYouWant.com, November 2010. 14 - 15 -THIRD, free speech is not constitutionally protected for public colleges. This means that the aff terminates in contradiction because the 1st amendment is only applicable to Congress. Madison 91: 16 -"Congress shall make...redress of grievances.” 17 -Madison, James. Father of constitution, 4th president of the United States of America, Husband to Dolly Madison, bad tenant, let white house burn to the ground, short, Notable Democratic-Republic. “US Constitution” 1st amendment. Constitution. 1791. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-30 23:50:49.137 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Valley Foley Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Jan Feb Neg 5 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any
- Caselist.RoundClass[0]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -201 7-04-2611:04:02.01 +2016-11-28 17:19:31.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Any1 +McGinnis, David - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -A ny1 +ALL - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 11 +2 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +These are all neg cites I'm reading on the November-December Topic - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Any1 +Big Moat Palooza
- Caselist.RoundClass[1]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -201 7-04-2611:09:08.01 +2016-12-17 21:24:44.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -A ny1 +Oakwood AI - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 21 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Any1 +Blake
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -201 7-04-2611:13:18.01 +2016-12-17 21:28:10.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Any1 +Brundage, Rick - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Any1 +University AG - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Any1 +Blake
- Caselist.RoundClass[3]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -201 7-04-3023:48:06.01 +2016-12-18 19:33:25.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Any1 +Panel - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -A ny1 +Dulles AW - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 41 +Semis - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Any1 +Blake
- Caselist.RoundClass[4]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-30 23:50:46.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any