Changes for page Valley Foley Neg
Summary
-
Objects (8 modified, 2 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[0]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,53 +1,11 @@ 1 -Alasdair Macintyre, After Virtue, 1981 2 -Armacost, Barbara. “Organizational culture and police misconduct.” The George Washington Law Review, vol. 72, no. 453, 2004. 3 -Armacost, Barbara. “Organizational culture and police misconduct.” The George Washington Law Review, vol. 72, no. 453, 2004. 4 -Bevir 99 ( Mark “Foucault and Critique: Deploying Agency Against Autonomy” KNP) 5 -Bevir 99 ( Mark “Foucault and Critique: Deploying Agency Against Autonomy” KNP) 6 -Carbado, Devon and Patrick Rock. “What exposes African Americans to police violence?” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, vol. 51, 2016. 7 -Carbado, Devon and Patrick Rock. “What exposes African Americans to police violence?” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, vol. 51, 2016. 8 -Chatalain, George. “Induction and the problem of the external world.” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 49, no. 19, September 11, 1952, pp. 601-607. 9 -Coburn, Robert C. Quals “A defense of ethical noncognitivism.” Philosophical Studies, vol. 62, no. 1, April 1991, pp. 67-80. 10 -Dr. Dominic Corva, Professor in Department of Geography at University of Washington, “Biopower and the Militarization of the Police Function”) https://www.academia.edu/298029/Biopower_and_the_Militarization_of_the_Police_Function || LB 11 -Eyre, Pete. "There Are No Good Cops | Cop Block." Cop Block. N.p., 01 Jan. 2014. Web. 03 Nov. 2016. 12 -Gonick, Lev and Isaac Prilleltensky. “Polities change, oppression remains: on the psychology and politics of oppression.” Political Psychology, vol. 17, no. 1, March 1996, pp. 127-148. 13 -Gonick, Lev and Isaac Prilleltensky. “Polities change, oppression remains: on the psychology and politics of oppression.” Political Psychology, vol. 17, no. 1, March 1996, pp. 127-148. 14 -Gottileb Paula Gottileb Professor of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin Madison. “Aristotle on Non-contradiction.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 26 January 2011. 15 -Heyman, Steven J. "THE FIRST DUTY OF GOVERNMENT: PROTECTION, LIBERTY AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT." Duke University, n.d. Web. 28 Oct. 16. 16 -http://archive.sgir.eu/uploads/Grayson-graysonsgir.pdf 17 -Huemer, Michael. The Problem of Political Authority. New York: Springer, October 2012. 18 -Huemer, Michael. The Problem of Political Authority. New York: Springer, October 2012. 19 -James Bernauer, philosophy professor, Boston College, 1990 (MICHAEL FOUCAULT'S FORCE OF FLIGHT: TOWARD AN ETHICS OF THOUGHT, pp. 141-2) 20 -Kennedy, Duncan (Professor of General Jurisprudence at the Harvard University Law School). "Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication." Harvard Law Review 89 (1976): p. 1685-1778. 21 -Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 22 -Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 23 -Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 24 -Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 25 -Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 26 -Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 27 -Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 28 -Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 29 -Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 30 -Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 31 -Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 32 -Kirby, John D. "Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard." Cornell Edu. Cornell Law Review, May 2000. Web. 21 Oct. 2016. 33 -Korsgaard, Christine. “Creating The Kingdom of Ends: Reciprocity and Responsibility in Personal Relations.” (p. 315). 34 -Lindeman, Kathryn M. (AB, Mount Holyoke College, 2005; PhD in philosophy, University of Pittsburgh) “Grounding constitutivism,” 2014. 35 -Lucas J.R. Lucas Professor of Philosophy Emeritus, University of Oxford. Reason and Reality. Ria University Press, 2009. Print. *Gendered language modified* 36 -Madar, Chase. “Why it’s impossible to indict a cop.” The Nation, November 25, 2014. 37 -Madar, Chase. “Why it’s impossible to indict a cop.” The Nation, November 25, 2014. 38 -Millgram, Elijah, "Practical Reason and the Structure of Actions," The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta. 39 -N O B R E A T H I N G 40 -Negate." Def. 1. Merriam Webser. Web. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/negate. 41 -Pinker, Steven. "Why Violence Is Vanishing." WSJ. N.p., 23 Sept. 2011. Web. 04 Nov. 2016. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424053111904106704576583203589408180 42 -Richard, ATandT Professor of Law – Texas Tech University School of Law, and Afsheen John, Professor – William Mitchell College of Law; Assistant General Counsel – Central Intelligence Agency, “Due Process and Targeted Killing of Terrorists,” Cardozo Law Review, November, 32 Cardozo L. Rev. 405, Lexis 43 -Rosen, Michael. “A qualified defense: in support of the doctrine of qualified immunity in excessive force cases, with some suggestions for its improvement.” Golden Gate University Law Review, vol. 35, no. 2, 2005. 44 -Schenwar, Maya et al. Who Do You Serve, Who Do You Protect?: Police Violence and Resistance in the United States. Haymarket Books, 2016. 45 -Schenwar, Maya et al. Who Do You Serve, Who Do You Protect?: Police Violence and Resistance in the United States. Haymarket Books, 2016. 46 -Schwartz, Joanna. NYU Law Review (2014): n. pag. 2014. Web. 20 Oct. 2016 47 -Shoemaker, David. "Rationality Is Permissibility." 'PEA Soup' Responsibility in the Margins, 25 July 2015. Web. 22 Oct. 2015. 48 -Smith, Mychal Denzel. "Abolish the Police. Instead, Let's Have Full Social, Economic, and Political Equality." The Nation. N.p., 29 June 2015. Web. 03 Nov. 2016.\ 49 -Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collége de France, 1975-76 p.258 50 -Street, Sharon. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value.” Philosophical Studies January 2006. Pgs 118-121 51 -Trent H., St. John’s U, Neoliberalism, Governmentality, and Ethics, Foucault Studies No6 Feb 2009) LA 52 -Where is Now? The Paradox of The Present. NPR July 26 2011 53 -Zapf, Christian, and Eben Moglen. "LINGUISTIC INDETERMINACY AND THE RULE OF LAW: ON THE PERILS OF MISUNDERSTANDING WITTGENSTEIN." Lexis Nexis. Georgetown Law Journal, Feb. 1996. Web. 20 Oct. 2015. 1 +Revenge porn is protected speech. 2 + Humbach, John A. "The Constitution and Revenge Porn." Pace Law Review 35.1 (2015). 3 +“The inherent repulsiveness …viewpoint, or the speaker.” 4 + 5 +Revenge porn is fundamentally oppressive. 6 +Filipovic, Jill. "'Revenge Porn' Is about Degrading Women Sexually and Professionally." The Guardian, 28 Jan. 2013. Web. 7 +“On revenge porn sites… reputations of young women.” 8 + 9 +Revenge porn totalizes the identities of those targeted, defining them to the world and leaving them literally helpless to respond. 10 +Murray, Christine and Allison Crowe. “‘Revenge porn as a form of intimate partner violence.” See the Triumph, April 6, 2014. Web. 11 +“One woman of the …, and raise awareness of this important issue.” - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -201 6-11-2817:19:32.01 +2017-04-26 11:04:04.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - McGinnis, David1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -A LL1 +Any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 21 +1 - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - NegCitesNovemberDecember1 +Jan Feb Neg 1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Big Moat Palooza1 +Any
- Caselist.CitesClass[1]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,23 @@ 1 -Gauthier, David P. Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986. Print. 1 +Ethical obligations derive from interactions among moral agents. 2 +Korsgard, Christine. “Creating the kingdom of ends: reciprocity and responsibility in personal relations.” Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 6, 1992, pp. 305-332. 3 + 4 +“The relations of reciprocity ;… the other responsible.” 5 +Korsgard, Christine. “Creating the kingdom of ends: reciprocity and responsibility in personal relations.” Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 6, 1992, pp. 305-332. 6 + 7 +Thus our ethical duties arise from mutually voluntary relations of reciprocity, and these agreements uniquely generate moral obligations. 8 +Gauthier, David (Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh). Morals by Agreement. (1986). 9 +“A contractarian theory … or morally neutral, base.” 10 + 11 +Thus the standard is consistency with contractual obligation. 12 + 13 +First, “protected speech” is subject to restriction in pursuit of vital interests. Kairys: 14 +Kairys, David. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. ReadHowYouWant.com, November 2010. 15 +“Speech is first categorized …he ‘strict scrutiny’ standard.” 16 + 17 +And, protected speech is subject to reasonable restriction in college classrooms for the purposes of education. The 11th Circuit of the US Court of Appeals: 18 +U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Bishop v. Aronov, 926 F.2d 1066, 1991. Ellipses in original. 19 +“Nevertheless, a correct legal analysis must … Dr. Bishop’s classroom is not an open forum.” 20 + 21 +Thus, colleges are contractually obligated to impose content-based restrictions. Russo: 22 +Russo, Charles. Handbook of Comparative Higher Education Law, RandL Education, 2013. 23 +“Students at both public … standards of teaching.” - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -201 6-12-1721:24:47.01 +2017-04-26 11:09:10.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - OakwoodAI1 +Any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 11 +2 - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - BlakeR11 +Jan Feb Neg 2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Blake1 +Any
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ 1 +That means we use a contractarian system of mutual restraint. Gauthier: 1 1 Gauthier, David P. Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986. Print. 3 +Moral principles are …moral dimension in their affairs. 2 2 3 -Humbach, John A. "The Constitution and Revenge Porn." Pace Law Review 35.1 (2015). 4 - 5 -Filipovic, Jill. "'Revenge Porn' Is about Degrading Women Sexually and Professionally." The Guardian, 28 Jan. 2013. Web. 6 - 7 -Murray, Christine and Allison Crowe. “‘Revenge porn as a form of intimate partner violence.” See the Triumph, April 6, 2014. Web. 5 +The rest of the case is analytic. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -201 6-12-1721:28:11.01 +2017-04-26 11:13:20.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Brundage, Rick1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - UniversityAG1 +Any - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - BlakeR31 +Jan Feb Neg 3 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Blake1 +Any
- Caselist.CitesClass[3]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,11 +1,15 @@ 1 -Korsgard, Christine. “Creating the kingdom of ends: reciprocity and responsibility in personal relations.” Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 6, 1992, pp. 305-332. 1 +First, what is constitutive of an agent provides the needed context to determine what it means to be good or bad. Geach: 2 +“There is no… good deer-stalker” 3 +Geach, P. T. "Good and Evil." Analysis 17.2 (1956): 33-42. Web. 2 2 3 -Gauthier, David (Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh). Morals by Agreement. (1986). 5 +Second, constitutivism is inescapable and generates non-optional norms- means agents can’t escape constitutive duties. Katsafanas: 6 +“So what’s special… practicality and queerness.” 7 +Thus the standard is consistency with the constitutive nature of the agent of action. 4 4 5 - Kairys,David.ThePoliticsofLaw:A ProgressiveCritique.ReadHowYouWant.com,November2010.6 - 9 +First, protected speech is subject to reasonable restriction in college classrooms for the purposes of education. The 11th Circuit of the US Court of Appeals notes: 10 +“Nevertheless, a correct… an open forum” 7 7 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Bishop v. Aronov, 926 F.2d 1066, 1991. Ellipses in original. 8 8 13 +Thus, colleges are contractually obligated to impose content-based restrictions. Russo: 14 +“Students at both… standards of teaching.” 9 9 Russo, Charles. Handbook of Comparative Higher Education Law, RandL Education, 2013. 10 - 11 -Fields, Cheryl. “A morale dilemma – black professors on white campuses – includes related article on mentorship programs for black faculty – Cover Story” June 23, 2007 Diverse Issues in Higher Education. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -201 6-12-1819:33:26.01 +2017-04-30 23:48:08.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Panel1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - DullesAW1 +Any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Semis1 +4 - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - BlakeSemis1 +Jan Feb Neg 4 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Blake1 +Any
- Caselist.RoundClass[0]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -201 6-11-2817:19:31.01 +2017-04-26 11:04:02.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - McGinnis, David1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -A LL1 +Any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 21 +1 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -These are all neg cites I'm reading on the November-December Topic - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Big Moat Palooza1 +Any
- Caselist.RoundClass[1]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -201 6-12-1721:24:44.01 +2017-04-26 11:09:08.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - OakwoodAI1 +Any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - 11 +2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Blake1 +Any
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -201 6-12-1721:28:10.01 +2017-04-26 11:13:18.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Brundage, Rick1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - UniversityAG1 +Any - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Blake1 +Any
- Caselist.RoundClass[3]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -201 6-12-1819:33:25.01 +2017-04-30 23:48:06.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Panel1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - DullesAW1 +Any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Semis1 +4 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - Blake1 +Any
- Caselist.CitesClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,17 @@ 1 +If we accept contradictory statements, language fails to make sense, making the resolution false. Lucas: 2 +"But why should...become just babble" 3 +J.R. Lucas Professor of Philosophy Emeritus, University of Oxford. Reason and Reality. Ria University Press, 2009. Print. *Gendered language modified* 4 + 5 +It’s impossible to argue against non-contradiction, which is true a priori and stops infinite regress. Gottileb: 6 +"Aristotle explains that... is similarly misguided" 7 +Paula Gottileb Professor of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin Madison. “Aristotle on Non-contradiction.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 26 January 2011. 8 + 9 +THUS, the standard is consistency with the epistemological principle of non-contradiction. 10 + 11 +“Protected speech” is by definition subject to restriction in pursuit of vital interests. Kairys: 12 +"Speech is first...strict scrutiny’ standard" 13 +Kairys, David. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. ReadHowYouWant.com, November 2010. 14 + 15 +THIRD, free speech is not constitutionally protected for public colleges. This means that the aff terminates in contradiction because the 1st amendment is only applicable to Congress. Madison 91: 16 +"Congress shall make...redress of grievances.” 17 +Madison, James. Father of constitution, 4th president of the United States of America, Husband to Dolly Madison, bad tenant, let white house burn to the ground, short, Notable Democratic-Republic. “US Constitution” 1st amendment. Constitution. 1791. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-30 23:49:50.119 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Valley Foley Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jan Feb NC 5 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any
- Caselist.RoundClass[4]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-30 23:49:47.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any