Changes for page Valley Foley Aff
on 2016/09/02 16:29
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Objects (0 modified, 2 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. gosuns07@gmailcom1 +XWiki.fenwayfan5@gmailcom
- Caselist.CitesClass[0]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,33 @@ 1 +Only internal motivations have the conceptual capacity to motivate action, which is a prerequisite for moral considerations. 2 +Katsafanas, Paul. “Deriving ethics from action: a nietzschean version of constitutivism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 83:3, pp. 620-660, November 2011. 3 +While externalism captures…decidedly odd property. 4 + 5 +Thus, morality is a system of reasons we can all accept—mutual justifiability is the only way to solve the subjectivity of abstract moral theories. 6 +Scanlon, Thomas. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard UP, 2000. Print. 7 +Contractualism can also … in certain contexts. 8 +Moral principles are adopted only if they can be justified on the basis of agent specific reasonable rejection. 9 +Nagel, Thomas. "One-to-One’." London Review of Books 4 (1999). 10 +The nerve of Scanlon’s … of any individual. 11 +Contractualism forms the basis for a moral community. If the purpose of moral norms is to facilitate life and communal interactions in a society, then a contractualist account of reasons comes first. 12 +Scanlon, Thomas. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard UP, 2000. Print. 13 +According to contractualism, … these principles require. 14 + 15 +Contractual obligations are agent relative—reasonable rejection of principles can only come between two rational agents. This means we evaluate every moral consideration on a 1-1 ratio, not whether the aggregate of everyone following the principle would have a positive net effect. James: 16 +James, Aaron. "Contractualism's (not so) slippery slope." Legal Theory 18.03 (2012): 263-292. 17 +According to contractualism, …reasonably object to the imposition. 18 + 19 +Thus the standard is consistency with the agent relative principle of reasonable rejection. 20 + 21 +Students cannot accept restrictions relative to the college because the basis of public universities and colleges is the constitution, which the protection of speech. Buchter: 22 +Buchter, Jonathan. “Contract law and the student-university relationship.” Indiana Law Journal, vol. 48, issue. 2, article 5, Winter 1973. 23 +This theoretical mixture …these constitutional rights. 24 + 25 + 26 +Metaethical actualism means no fiat for counteradvocacies. Jackson and Pargetter: 27 +Frank Jackson and Robert Pargetter, “Oughts, Options, and Actualism”, Philosophical Review, 1986 28 +There are four considerations … referred to at the beginning.” 29 + 30 + 31 +And, contracts will always be made based on subjective emotions because that contributes to agent relative rejection. 32 +Spranca, Mark, Elisa Minsk, and Jonathan Baron. "Omission and commission in judgment and choice." Journal of experimental social psychology 27.1 (1991): 76-105. 33 +Subjects read scenarios …ignorant of the effects of not acting. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-26 11:00:01.121 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Valley Foley Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jan Feb AC 1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any
- Caselist.RoundClass[0]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-26 10:59:59.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any