Changes for page Syosset Wu Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:41
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[1]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-09-17 03:52:25. 4461 +2016-09-17 03:52:25.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,29 @@ 1 +A. Interpretation: The Aff must defend hypothetical implementation of the resolution by a legislative body. This does not require the use of any particular style or type of evidence — only that the topic and government policy ought to determine the debate. 2 + 3 +“ Resolved” means the affirmative must defend the implementation of a prohibition to nuclear power. Parcher 4 +Jeff Parcher. (Former debate coach at Georgetown University). February 2001. http://www.ndtceda.com/archives/200102/0790.html SHSJW 5 + Pardon me if I ... to a question. 6 + 7 +Also Black’s Law Dictionary defines prohibition as 8 +“Restraining a certain actions by a certain party, normally by the order of a legitimate legal authority”. 9 + 10 +Net benefits 11 +1. T Version of the Aff Solves 12 + 13 +2. Limits – Specific, limited resolutions ensure mutual ground which is key to sustainable controversy without sacrificing creativity or openness 14 +Steinberg and Freeley 2008 15 + 16 +Austin J. Freeley and David L. Steinberg. (Austin J. Freeley is a Boston based attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, AND **David L. Steinberg , Lecturer of Communication Studies @ U Miami). Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making. 2008. 17 +Debate is a means ... the following discussion. 18 + 19 +3. Education – Scenario simulation lets students test decisions and strategies without the real stakes of having to implement them—this process is more transformative than the content of the 1ac. Hanghoj 2008 20 + 21 +Hanghoj, Thorkild. (PhD, assistant professor, School of Education, University of Aarhus, also affiliated with the Danish Research Centre on Education and Advanced Media Materials, located at the Institute of Literature, Media and Cultural Studies at the University of Southern Denmark) http://static.sdu.dk/mediafiles/Files/Information_til/Studerende_ved_SDU/Din_uddannelse/phd_hum/afhandlinger/2009/ThorkilHanghoej.pdf 22 +Joas’ re-interpretation of ... problem-based scenarios. 23 + 24 +4. Preparation and clash—changing the topic post facto manipulates balance of prep, which structurally favors the aff because they speak last and permute alternatives—strategic fairness is key to engaging a well-prepared opponent 25 +Topical fairness requirements are key to meaningful dialogue—monopolizing strategy and prep makes the discussion one-sided and subverts any meaningful neg role. Galloway 07 26 + 27 +Ryan Galloway 7. (Samford Comm professor). Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28. 2007. 28 + 29 +Debate as a ... of topical advocacy - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-09-17 03:52:27.902 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Mariah Cook - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Nueva JT - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Syosset Wu Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +SEPTOCT - T - FW - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Yale