| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,49 @@ |
|
1 |
+Arrogantly tying responsibility to some external purpose is playing god and creates violence |
|
2 |
+Zupancic 2k (Alenka, Alenka Zupančič, Ph.D., is a Lacanian philosopher and social theorist, based as a full-time researcher in the philosophy department of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts. “Ethics of the Real: Kant and Lacan”, p. 96-7) // SHSAM |
|
3 |
+“Another problem still remains, however: the question of the possibility of ( |
|
4 |
+AND |
|
5 |
+as something that is `essentially a by-product' of our actions. |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+The locating of the object of ones desire as external to the current letter of the law maintains a framework of fantasy that imposes a forced choice and forecloses actual freedom. |
|
8 |
+Zizek 08, Slavoj (white shirt wearing mouth breather), "THE PLAGUE OF FANTASIES", Verso, 2008 cnqzu.com/library/Economics/marxian20economics/Zizek,20Slavoj-The20Plague20of20Fantasies.pdf, p. 38-40 SHSAM |
|
9 |
+Let us imagine a more down-to-earth situation: when, after |
|
10 |
+AND |
|
11 |
+to choose freely - no wonder the consequences of this act are so catastrophic |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+A phantasmic framing leaves us trapped in a tragic quest to reclaim our happiness that necessitates the denial of pleasure and true freedom. The utopian vision of the fantasy will always be unobtainable. |
|
14 |
+Zizek 08, Slavoj (white shirt wearing mouth breather), "THE PLAGUE OF FANTASIES", Verso, 2008 cnqzu.com/library/Economics/marxian20economics/Zizek,20Slavoj-The20Plague20of20Fantasies.pdf, p. 43-47 SHSAM |
|
15 |
+Desire emerges when drive gets caught in the cobweb of Law/prohibition, in |
|
16 |
+AND |
|
17 |
+in the very agency of the law which prohibits the access to enjoyment. |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+My alternative - traverse the fantasy in the context of the resolution by embracing the empty gesture that explicit law represents when it conflicts with the spirit of the law. The perm is impossible as the phantasmic framing underpinning the AC fundamentally disavows any notion of responsibility for subjects. |
|
20 |
+Zizek 08, Slavoj (white shirt wearing mouth breather), "THE PLAGUE OF FANTASIES", Verso, 2008 cnqzu.com/library/Economics/marxian20economics/Zizek,20Slavoj-The20Plague20of20Fantasies.pdf, p. 38-40 SHSAM |
|
21 |
+Or - to put it another way - the paradoxical role of unwritten rules is |
|
22 |
+AND |
|
23 |
+closed circular palpitation which finds satisfaction in endlessly repeating the same failed gesture. |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+This allows us to question the ways in which the unconscious structures our manifestations of desire through our analytic approach allows the formulation of true political praxis. Instead of seeking enjoyment through the other, we must start with internal evaluations |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+The first ethical imperative is uniquely the domain of psychoanalysis – the K then controls the internal link to the AC’s framing as without the analysis, knowledge is impossible. The ROTJ is to vote for the debater that has the best psychoanalytic methodology that can properly understand the nature of human-constructed reality. |
|
28 |
+Kesel 09, Marc de (Associate professor in philosophy at Saint Paul University, Ottawa, Canada. His fields of research are Public Ethics, Continental Philosophy, Political Theory, Holocaust Studies, Religion Studies and Freudo-Lacanian Theory), "Eros and Ethics Reading Jacques Lacan’s Seminar VII", UNY series, Insinuations: Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, Literature, 2009 State University of New York, p. 49 SHSAM |
|
29 |
+In the fi rst lesson of the seminar, Lacan says that the moral dimension |
|
30 |
+AND |
|
31 |
+at the base of all of this lies an ethical imperative for Lacan. |
|
32 |
+ |
|
33 |
+Any moral stance that doesn’t take into account desire will inevitably fail due to its fantasmic framing of the real. |
|
34 |
+Porttikivi 7/31/2011 Janne Porttikivi is a translator and independent researcher, based in Helsinki. He has published articles on psychoanalysis, literature and philosophy; “What’s so funny about Infinite Justice?,” Law and Evil: Philosophy, Politics, Psychoanalysis, pgs 212-214 // SHSAM |
|
35 |
+The idea of ethics is simple and revolutionary, it means a clear- cut |
|
36 |
+AND |
|
37 |
+empirical domain, everything which gives pleasure or makes the subject happy.77 |
|
38 |
+ |
|
39 |
+We must use the basis of understanding the universe in terms of the real and the symbolic because they are the driving force behind human experience |
|
40 |
+Slavoj Zizek, professor of philosophy at university of Ljubljana, The Indivisible Remainder: An Essay on Schelling and Related Matters, 1996, pg. 227-228 |
|
41 |
+Is not this virtual state of an electron which, upon admitting its mistake and |
|
42 |
+AND |
|
43 |
+any external boundary that would enable us to conceive it as ‘actual’. |
|
44 |
+ |
|
45 |
+Language has a dialectic relationship which mediates social relations of domination |
|
46 |
+Slavoj Zizek, researcher at the institute for sociology at Ljubljana, The Sublime Object of Ideology, 1989, pg. 212 |
|
47 |
+Ernesto Laclau was quite right to remark that it is language which is, in |
|
48 |
+AND |
|
49 |
+of domination, its objective counter¬part is of course wealth as the embodiment, |