| ... |
... |
@@ -1,17
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-A Interpretation: The affirmative must defend the actor the solvency advocate specifies. |
| 2 |
|
-B Violation: Their solvency advocate specifies all circuits and nowhere mentions the Supreme Court. |
| 3 |
|
-Auner 16 their advocate, Thomas. “For The Protection of Society’s Most Vulnerable, The ADA Should Apply To Arrests.” Los Angeles Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. 2016. http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol49/iss1/10 SHSAM |
| 4 |
|
-Excessive force claims stemming from the Fourth Amendment and section 1983 of the Civil Rights |
| 5 |
|
-AND |
| 6 |
|
-incentivize proper police training and provide uniform federal protections for the mentally ill. |
| 7 |
|
-C Vote Neg: |
| 8 |
|
-1 – Predictability |
| 9 |
|
-2 – Academic dishonesty |
| 10 |
|
-1. Evidence distortion violates intellectual integrity which is a voter that comes first. |
| 11 |
|
-Torson 13 Adam Torson (debate coach) “Debate and the Virtue of Intellectual Integrity” Vbriefly March 25th 2013 http://vbriefly.com/2013/03/25/20133debate-and-the-virtue-of-intellectual-integrity-by-adam-torson/ JW |
| 12 |
|
-Intellectual integrity denotes a commitment to the honest pursuit of truth through openness to evidence |
| 13 |
|
-AND |
| 14 |
|
-as a very strange outcome in any debate event worthy of the name. |
| 15 |
|
-2. Kills scholarship |
| 16 |
|
-D Framing: |
| 17 |
|
-Competing interps |