| ... |
... |
@@ -1,49
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-==First is Framing == |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-====The role of the judge is to be a critical analyst testing whether the underlying assumptions of the AFF are valid. This is a question of the whether the AFF scholarship is good – not the passage of the plan. ==== |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-====First, the aff advocacy takes the wrong approach – our role as intellectuals is not to offer prescriptive solutions, rather it is to offer analyses that expose harmful powers and expose them to light, this is a pre-req to policy making ==== |
| 8 |
|
-**Jones 99 ~~Richard Wyn Jones, Professor International Politics @ Aberystwyth University, '99 (Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory, p. 155-163)~~ ** |
| 9 |
|
-The central political task of the intellectuals is to aid in the construction of a |
| 10 |
|
-AND |
| 11 |
|
-as both an inspiration and a challenge to critical security studies. |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
- |
| 15 |
|
-====Second, the knowledge claims of the AC are the jumping off point for the debate – our framework provides a more reasonable neg burden. When a student turns in an F paper, no teacher has an obligation to write an entirely new paper to show it was bad – pointing out major academic deficiencies would justify failing the paper – the ballot asks who did the better debating, so if their analysis is wrong, they haven't. ==== |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
- |
| 18 |
|
- |
| 19 |
|
-==Second is the Substance == |
| 20 |
|
- |
| 21 |
|
- |
| 22 |
|
-====These environmental justice movements only re-entrench neoliberalism because of the interests for transnational capital and therefore causes more structural violence ==== |
| 23 |
|
-**Cleere 1 (Cleere, Rickie. "Environmental Racism and the Movement for Black Lives: Grassroots Power in the 21st Century." Pomona College, 2016. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1153andcontext=pomona_theses.) ** |
| 24 |
|
-Opal Tometi, BLM co-founder, has said that environmental issues are " |
| 25 |
|
-AND |
| 26 |
|
-justice movements. CX is binding and this a direct link to neoliberalism. |
| 27 |
|
- |
| 28 |
|
- |
| 29 |
|
-====And, this turns case because the neoliberal violence of the state further entrenches violence through co-optation and causes a struggle for black communities on a global scale ==== |
| 30 |
|
-**Cleere 2 (Cleere, Rickie. "Environmental Racism and the Movement for Black Lives: Grassroots Power in the 21st Century." Pomona College, 2016. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1153andcontext=pomona_theses.) ** |
| 31 |
|
-Through my research and investigation I have come to the conclusion that environmental justice movement |
| 32 |
|
-AND |
| 33 |
|
-doing something to contribute to a new era of revolutionary struggle. |
| 34 |
|
- |
| 35 |
|
- |
| 36 |
|
- |
| 37 |
|
-====And, Cap causes extinction and endless structural violence – it is a try or die for the alt. ==== |
| 38 |
|
-**Farbod 15 ( Faramarz Farbod , PhD Candidate @ Rutgers, Prof @ Moravian College, Monthly Review, http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2015/farbod020615.html, 6-2) ** |
| 39 |
|
-Global capitalism is the 800-pound gorilla. The twin ecological and economic crises |
| 40 |
|
-AND |
| 41 |
|
-and social systems will soon reach a point of no return. |
| 42 |
|
- |
| 43 |
|
- |
| 44 |
|
- |
| 45 |
|
-====The debate is about starting points - the AFF begins with prohibiting nuclear power which puts the cart before the horse. The alternative is a cultural, anti-neoliberal critique to expand our understanding of state violence which is a necessary pre requisite and this means the neolib is not inevitable. ==== |
| 46 |
|
-**Cleere 3 (Cleere, Rickie. "Environmental Racism and the Movement for Black Lives: Grassroots Power in the 21st Century." Pomona College, 2016. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1153andcontext=pomona_theses.) ** |
| 47 |
|
-I was first introduced to the concept of environmental racism in college courses, but |
| 48 |
|
-AND |
| 49 |
|
-many lives as possible must challenge the root of the problem: neoliberalism. |