Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[16]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[17]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[16]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-03-08 06:40:34.970
	1	+2017-03-08 06:40:34.0

Caselist.CitesClass[17]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,6 @@
	1	+I isolated the role of the ballot for you. Don't tell me that you couldn't predict the ROB or how to interact with it. I think it's pretty clear and delineates how to link in.
	2	+
	3	+The role of the ballot is to reject traditional forms of scholarship in favor of voting for the debater with the best kritikal methodology. This means rejecting roleplaying, state-good, policy-making scholarship, and other postmodern constructs which plague modern academia. Kritikal methodology refers to pre-fiat discursive literature and scholarship. It’s a means-based role of the judge. The 1AC comes before theory/T.
	4	+Blind adherence to fiat has drained debate of meaning. The hegemonic structure you call fiat is a tactic of marginalization to prevent institutional subversion – LINK TURNS your T/theory standards – deliberation is dead without critical literature.
	5	+Gunder ‘9: senior planning lecturer at the Aukland University Michael. “Planning in Ten Words or Less: A Lacanian Entanglement with Spatial Planning”. Pg. 11-12.; AB
	6	+The hegemonic network, or bloc, initially shapes the debates and draws on appropriate policies of desired success, such as the needs of bohemians, knowledge clusters, or talented knowledge workers, as to what constitutes their desired enjoyment (cobblestones, chrome and cappuccinos at sidewalk cafes) and what is therefore lacking in local competitiveness. In tum, this defines what is blighted and dysfunctional and in need of economic, spatial planning, or other, remedy. Such an argument is predicated on a logic, or more accurately a rhetoric, that a lack of a particular defined type of enjoyment, or competitiveness (for surely they are one and the same) is inherently unhealthy for the aggregate social body. Lack and its resolution are generally presented as technical, rather than political issues. Consequently, technocrats in partnership with their "˜dominant stakeholders` can ensure the impression of rationally seeking to produce happiness for the many whilst, of course, achieving their stakeholders’ specific interests (Gunder and Hillier 2007a, 469). The current post-democratic` milieu facilitates the above through avoidance of critical policy debate challenging favored orthodox positions and policy approaches. Consideration of policy deficiencies, or alternative solutions, are eradicated from political debate so that while token institutions of liberal democracy’ are retained conflicting positions and arguments are negated (Stavrakakis 2003, 59). Consequently, the safe names in the field who feed the policy orthodoxy are repeatedly used or their work drawn upon by different stakeholders, while more critical voices are silenced by their inability to shape policy debates’ (Boland 2007, 1032). The economic development or spatial planning policy analyst thus continues to partition reality ideologically by deploying only the orthodox "successful” or "best practice” economic development or spatial planning responses. This further maintains the dominant, or hegemonic, status quo while providing "˜a cover and shield against critical thought by acting in the manner of a "buffer" isolating the political held from any research that is independent and radical in its conception as in its implications for public policy’ (Wacquant 2004, 99). At the same time, adoption of the hegemonic orthodoxy tends to generate similar policy responses for every competing local area or city-region, largely resulting in a zero-sum game (Blair and Kumar 1997).

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-03-08 06:40:35.855

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+x

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+x

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+20

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Sunset bhat Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+000 - Anarchy of Becoming V4 ROB

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Early Disclosure - NDCA and TOC