| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,19 @@ |
|
1 |
+Interpretation- On the Jan/Feb 2017 topic, the aff cannot specify a single type of constitutionally protected speech that their advocacy does remove a restriction for. To clarify, affs that remove restrictions in a single type of speech are illegitimate. |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+"Any" is a negative polarity term which means that it is indefinite- especially considering that the res* is a downward entailing operator |
|
4 |
+Kadmon and Landman 93 **~~Nirit Kadmon and Fred Landman. "Any" Linguistics and Philosophy Vol 16, No. 4 Aug 1993. Springer. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25001516. ~~ |
|
5 |
+As is well |
|
6 |
+AND |
|
7 |
+ambiguous:PSanyisan quantifier.
|
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+"Any" does not tolerate exceptions, because it’s either an existential quantifier or a universal quantifier |
|
10 |
+Kadmon and Landman 93 **~~Nirit Kadmon and Fred Landman. "Any" Linguistics and Philosophy Vol 16, No. 4 Aug 1993. Springer. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25001516. ~~ |
|
11 |
+What is it |
|
12 |
+AND |
|
13 |
+don’t have potatoes. |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+1. Specification is incompatible with "any" as an indefinite. Indefinites do not refer to particular instantiations of the resolution. ==== |
|
16 |
+NOD **~~New Oxford Dictionary "Indefinite" adjective.~~ |
|
17 |
+lasting for an |
|
18 |
+AND |
|
19 |
+, etc., referred to. |