Changes for page Success Academy Black Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:41
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-11-24 21:12:24. 421 +2016-11-24 21:12:24.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,31 @@ 1 +Interpretation: The affirmative must defend the Unites States federal government ought to limit qualified immunity for police officers. You can discuss non-topical issues under the world of my interp, you just cannot claim that your advocacy is to fight them and that you should win for that. 2 +"Resolved" means enactment of a law. 3 + 4 +**Words and Phrases 64** Words and Phrases Permanent Edition (Multi-volume set of judicial definitions). "Resolved". 1964. 5 +Definition of the 6 +AND 7 +establish by law". 8 + 9 +Ground- Absent a topical requirement, the aff will be biased by competitive incentives to find the most uncontroversial advocacy possible That limits me to offensive arguments. Unfairness kills the incentive for people to debate. Links turns all their offense since there is no reason to work and engage the aff. No one will hear the aff. 10 +**Speice et al 03,** Patrick and Jim Lyle, 2003, "Traditional Policy Debate: Now More Than Ever", Debaters Research Guide, http://groups.wfu.edu/debate/MiscSites/DRGArticles/SpeiceLyle2003htm.htm) 11 +As with any 12 +AND 13 +for all participants. 14 + 15 +Violations of competitive equity prevent effective dialogue and participation. 16 +**Galloway 07** Ryan, Samford Comm prof, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28, 2007 17 +Debate as a 18 +AND 19 +1985, p. 114). 20 + 21 +Only limited topics protect participants from research overload which materially affects our lives outside of round. 22 +**Harris 13** Scott Harris (Director of Debate at U Kansas, 2006 National Debate Coach of the Year, Vice President of the American Forensic Association, 2nd speaker at the NDT in 1981). "This ballot." 5 April 2013. CEDA Forums. http://www.cedadebate.org/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4762.0;attach=1655 23 +I understand that 24 +AND 25 +prep to engage. 26 + 27 +Jurisdiction- The judge only has jurisdiction to vote on the resolution. While the 1AC might be pragmatic to discuss, it doesn’t offer a reason to vote for you if you don’t defend the resolution. It just offers a reason to change the resolution. Also takes out educational reasons to prefer your interp. 28 +**Branse 15**, David, 2015, The Role of the Judge, http://nsdupdate.com/2015/09/04/the-role-of-the-judge-by-david-branse-part-one/ 29 +My ultimate view 30 +AND 31 +on your advocacy. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-24 21:12:25.531 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +David Wang - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Cambridge JL - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +12 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Success Academy Black Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NOV DEC - Defend the Topic T - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +The 13th Scarsdale Invitational