| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,26 @@ |
|
1 |
+Interpretation: The aff must defend the resolution as a generic statement. To clarify, this means you can’t specify a country or enforcement mechanism. |
|
2 |
+Standards |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+1. Common Usage- the generic interpretation is the only one consistent with common usage. |
|
5 |
+Nebel 14 provides an example of governments, 2014, On specifying Just Governments, http://vbriefly.com/2014/12/19/jake-nebel-on-specifying-just-governments/ HSLA//SC |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+To my ear |
|
8 |
+AND |
|
9 |
+a later article.) |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+AND- Semantics are the best way to reduce abuse- pragmatic debates incentivizes debaters to lie on the T debate to win the round. |
|
12 |
+Nebel 15 Jake, The Priority of Resolutional Semantics, 2015, http://vbriefly.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/thepriorityofresolutionalsemantics1.pdf HSLA//SC |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+One way admits |
|
15 |
+AND |
|
16 |
+avoids these problems. |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+2. Limits- only limited topics protect participants from overload which materially affects our lives outside of round. |
|
19 |
+Harris 13 |
|
20 |
+Scott Harris (Director of Debate at U Kansas, 2006 National Debate Coach of the Year, Vice President of the American Forensic Association, 2nd speaker at the NDT in 1981). “This ballot.” 5 April 2013. CEDA Forums. http://www.cedadebate.org/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4762.0;attach=1655 HSLA//SC |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+I understand that |
|
23 |
+AND |
|
24 |
+my everyday existence. |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+T is a voting issue |