| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,19 @@ |
|
1 |
+A – Interpretation: Affirmative debaters must affirm the resolution through governmental implementation of a policy that ends restriction on constitutionally protected speech |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Resolved implies a policy |
|
4 |
+Louisiana House 05 |
|
5 |
+Resolution A legislative instrument that generally is used for making declarations, stating policies, |
|
6 |
+AND |
|
7 |
+, 13.1 , 6.8 , and 7.4) |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+1. Predictable Limits - The resolution proposes the question the negative is prepared to answer and creates a bounded list of potential affs for us to think about. Debate has unique potential to change attitudes and grow critical thinking skills because it forces pre-round internal deliberation on a focused, common ground of debate. And, a limited topic of discussion that provides for equitable ground is key to decision-making and advocacy skills because it is key to have the negative be prepared to engage in the debate. |
|
10 |
+Steinberg and Freeley 08 |
|
11 |
+Debate is a means of settling differences, so there must be a difference of |
|
12 |
+AND |
|
13 |
+particular point of difference, which will be outlined in the following discussion. |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+Fairness is key to effective dialogue~-~~-~-monopolizing strategy makes discussion one-sided and subverts inclusion of the neg~-~~-~- turns their inclusion arguments |
|
16 |
+Galloway 7 |
|
17 |
+Debate as a dialogue sets an argumentative table, where all parties receive a relatively |
|
18 |
+AND |
|
19 |
+substitutes for topical action do not accrue the dialogical benefits of topical advocacy. |