Changes for page Stuyvesant Fennell Neg
Summary
-
Attachments (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
-
Objects (1 modified, 3 added, 3 removed)
Details
- Stuyvesant-Fennell-Neg-Harrison RR-Round2.docx
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.kathfennell@hotmailcom - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -47.7 KB - Content
- Caselist.CitesClass[116]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,20 +1,0 @@ 1 -Epistemology comes first because labeling things moral or immoral is just a function of knowledge. We need to know how we know what right and wrong are before we can pick the best definition. A priori reasoning is impossible so the only epistemologically sound basis for morality is experience. 2 - 3 -Schwartz 09 “A Defense of Naïve Empiricism: It is Neither Self-Refuting Nor Dogmatic.” Stephen P. Schwartz. Ithaca College. pp.1-14. 4 - The empirical support …an empirical claim. 5 - 6 -All humans experience the badness of pain and the goodness of pleasure. 7 - 8 -Nagel Thomas Nagel, The View From Nowhere, HUP, 1986: 156-168. 9 -I shall defend … the appearances here. 10 - 11 -Thus, because each agent values their own pleasure, they must also value the pleasure of others. 12 - 13 -Sayre-McCord Geoffrey Sayre-McCord "Mill's "Proof" of the Principle of Utility: A More than Half-Hearted Defense" volume 18, number 2 Spring 2001, 330-360. www.unc.edu/~gsmunc/phil22/Mill's_Proof.pdf 14 -According to the … of all the rest. 15 - 16 -Therefore, since we have no non-arbitrary reason to value our own pleasure over the pleasure of others, the standard is maximizing expected wellbeing. Prefer additionally: 17 - 18 -1. Topic Education – Util forces debates about what actually happens in the real world because we have to use empirics and analyze the consequences of the plan versus neg advocacy. This increases topic education because it forces research on the effects of the resolution and thus learn more about the topic. Topic education is key to education because we use it in the real-world to talk about current topics. 19 - 20 -2. Exclusion – Util is the least exclusive because (a) it’s the easiest to understand: most net benefits equals a win (b) it doesn’t require access to private sites such as jstor and (c) it’s largely influenced by weighing, which is unconstrained by resources. Exclusion comes first as we ought to maximize opportunities for people to join the activity before we can debate about their experience. Exclusion outweighs because people need to be in debate to get any benefits from it. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-16 13:49:28.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -88 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Stuyvesant Fennell Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -FW - Util - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any
- Caselist.CitesClass[117]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,4 +1,0 @@ 1 -Use epistemic modesty to account for the nonzero chance that you are wrong on the framework debate. That’s probability of the moral framework being true multiplied by the value of an action under that framework 2 - 3 -Christensen 13 David Christensen, Professor of Philosophy @ Brown University, “Epistemic Modesty Defended”. The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays, edited by David Christensen and Jennifer Lackey, Oxford University Press, 2013 4 -One might, of …epistemic modesty entirely. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-16 13:49:30.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -88 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Stuyvesant Fennell Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -FW - Epistemic Modesty - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any
- Caselist.RoundClass[87]
-
- OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Stuyvesant/Fennell+Neg/Stuyvesant-Fennell-Neg-Harrison%20RR-Round2.docx
- Caselist.RoundClass[88]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -116,117 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-16 13:49:25.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Stuyvesant/Fennell+Neg/Stuyvesant-Fennell-Neg-Any-Round9.docx - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,2 +1,0 @@ 1 -FW - Util 2 -FW - Epistemic Modesty - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any
- Caselist.CitesClass[101]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,20 @@ 1 +Epistemology comes first because labeling things moral or immoral is just a function of knowledge. We need to know how we know what right and wrong are before we can pick the best definition. A priori reasoning is impossible so the only epistemologically sound basis for morality is experience. 2 + 3 +Schwartz 09 “A Defense of Naïve Empiricism: It is Neither Self-Refuting Nor Dogmatic.” Stephen P. Schwartz. Ithaca College. pp.1-14. 4 + The empirical support …an empirical claim. 5 + 6 +All humans experience the badness of pain and the goodness of pleasure. 7 + 8 +Nagel Thomas Nagel, The View From Nowhere, HUP, 1986: 156-168. 9 +I shall defend … the appearances here. 10 + 11 +Thus, because each agent values their own pleasure, they must also value the pleasure of others. 12 + 13 +Sayre-McCord Geoffrey Sayre-McCord "Mill's "Proof" of the Principle of Utility: A More than Half-Hearted Defense" volume 18, number 2 Spring 2001, 330-360. www.unc.edu/~gsmunc/phil22/Mill's_Proof.pdf 14 +According to the … of all the rest. 15 + 16 +Therefore, since we have no non-arbitrary reason to value our own pleasure over the pleasure of others, the standard is maximizing expected wellbeing. Prefer additionally: 17 + 18 +1. Topic Education – Util forces debates about what actually happens in the real world because we have to use empirics and analyze the consequences of the plan versus neg advocacy. This increases topic education because it forces research on the effects of the resolution and thus learn more about the topic. Topic education is key to education because we use it in the real-world to talk about current topics. 19 + 20 +2. Exclusion – Util is the least exclusive because (a) it’s the easiest to understand: most net benefits equals a win (b) it doesn’t require access to private sites such as jstor and (c) it’s largely influenced by weighing, which is unconstrained by resources. Exclusion comes first as we ought to maximize opportunities for people to join the activity before we can debate about their experience. Exclusion outweighs because people need to be in debate to get any benefits from it. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-12 03:10:56.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +78 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stuyvesant Fennell Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +FW - Util - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any
- Caselist.CitesClass[102]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,4 @@ 1 +Use epistemic modesty to account for the nonzero chance that you are wrong on the framework debate. That’s probability of the moral framework being true multiplied by the value of an action under that framework 2 + 3 +Christensen 13 David Christensen, Professor of Philosophy @ Brown University, “Epistemic Modesty Defended”. The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays, edited by David Christensen and Jennifer Lackey, Oxford University Press, 2013 4 +One might, of …epistemic modesty entirely. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-12 03:10:57.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +78 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stuyvesant Fennell Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +FW - Epistemic Modesty - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any
- Caselist.RoundClass[78]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +101,102 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-12 03:10:54.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - OpenSource
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Stuyvesant/Fennell+Neg/Stuyvesant-Fennell-Neg-Any-Round9.docx - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Any