Changes for page Stuyvesant Fennell Neg

Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:41

From version < 502.1 >
edited by Katherine Fennell
on 2017/04/16 17:28
To version < 528.1 >
edited by Katherine Fennell
on 2017/04/16 17:51
< >
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Stuyvesant-Fennell-Neg-Harrison RR-Round2.docx
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.kathfennell@hotmailcom
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +47.7 KB
Content
Caselist.CitesClass[101]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,20 +1,0 @@
1 -Epistemology comes first because labeling things moral or immoral is just a function of knowledge. We need to know how we know what right and wrong are before we can pick the best definition. A priori reasoning is impossible so the only epistemologically sound basis for morality is experience.
2 -
3 -Schwartz 09 “A Defense of Naïve Empiricism: It is Neither Self-Refuting Nor Dogmatic.” Stephen P. Schwartz. Ithaca College. pp.1-14.
4 - The empirical support …an empirical claim.
5 -
6 -All humans experience the badness of pain and the goodness of pleasure.
7 -
8 -Nagel Thomas Nagel, The View From Nowhere, HUP, 1986: 156-168.
9 -I shall defend … the appearances here.
10 -
11 -Thus, because each agent values their own pleasure, they must also value the pleasure of others.
12 -
13 -Sayre-McCord Geoffrey Sayre-McCord "Mill's "Proof" of the Principle of Utility: A More than Half-Hearted Defense" volume 18, number 2 Spring 2001, 330-360. www.unc.edu/~gsmunc/phil22/Mill's_Proof.pdf
14 -According to the … of all the rest.
15 -
16 -Therefore, since we have no non-arbitrary reason to value our own pleasure over the pleasure of others, the standard is maximizing expected wellbeing. Prefer additionally:
17 -
18 -1. Topic Education – Util forces debates about what actually happens in the real world because we have to use empirics and analyze the consequences of the plan versus neg advocacy. This increases topic education because it forces research on the effects of the resolution and thus learn more about the topic. Topic education is key to education because we use it in the real-world to talk about current topics.
19 -
20 -2. Exclusion – Util is the least exclusive because (a) it’s the easiest to understand: most net benefits equals a win (b) it doesn’t require access to private sites such as jstor and (c) it’s largely influenced by weighing, which is unconstrained by resources. Exclusion comes first as we ought to maximize opportunities for people to join the activity before we can debate about their experience. Exclusion outweighs because people need to be in debate to get any benefits from it.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-04-12 03:10:56.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -78
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -9
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Stuyvesant Fennell Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -FW - Util
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Caselist.CitesClass[102]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,4 +1,0 @@
1 -Use epistemic modesty to account for the nonzero chance that you are wrong on the framework debate. That’s probability of the moral framework being true multiplied by the value of an action under that framework
2 -
3 -Christensen 13 David Christensen, Professor of Philosophy @ Brown University, “Epistemic Modesty Defended”. The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays, edited by David Christensen and Jennifer Lackey, Oxford University Press, 2013
4 -One might, of …epistemic modesty entirely.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-04-12 03:10:57.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -78
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -9
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Stuyvesant Fennell Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -FW - Epistemic Modesty
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Caselist.CitesClass[103]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,13 +1,0 @@
1 -The standard is combatting material inequalities. This is the most epistemologically sound starting point for moral decisions.
2 -
3 -Mills 05, Charles, 2005, Ideal Theory” as Ideology,
4 -
5 -The crucial common …male-dominated philosophical literature.
6 -
7 -3 implications:
8 -
9 -First, only non-ideal theory is inclusive of all perspectives, increasing the probability that ethical deliberation can come to sound conclusions since exclusion of voices leads to privileged views of ethics that become ivory tower.
10 -
11 -Second, only this framework is motivating: oppressed groups cant participate in the aff framework which means they cant be compelled to action. That’s a prerequisite to ethics - if no one can adopt a theory it has no use.
12 -
13 -Third, non-ideal theory necessitates consequentialism since instead of following rules that assume an already equal playing field, we take steps to correct the material injustice. This means that the MOST important impacts in this debate are the lives of materially oppressed people living in the status quo.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-04-14 00:11:48.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -79
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Quarters
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Stuyvesant Fennell Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -FW - Materiality
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Caselist.CitesClass[104]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,11 +1,0 @@
1 -Voting aff increases the amount of hate speech –
2 -
3 -a. The plan legitimizes and legalizes hate speech which means people will take advantage of the lack of regulation and will start saying racist things because there is no fear of recourse and it is socially acceptable
4 -
5 -b. Your solvency relies on hate speech increasing – the only way counter speech works is if we know who the racists are because they say racist things out loud, which means double bind – either (a) hate speech doesn’t increase and your solvency is denied and you vote negative on presumption because you need to justify a shift from the squo or (b) your solvency is true, and you increase hate speech
6 -
7 -This causes psychological violence and internalized hatred. Even if speech codes don’t decrease hate speech, codes stop the impression that hate speech can go unpunished.
8 -
9 -Delgado and Stefacic 09, Richard Delgado - University Professor, Seattle University School of Law; J.D., 1974, University of California, Berkeley. Jean Stefancic – Research Professor, Seattle University School of Law; M.A., 1989, University of San Francisco. “FOUR OBSERVATIONS ABOUT HATE SPEECH.” WAKE FOREST LAW REVIEW. 2009. http://wakeforestlawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Delgado_LawReview_01.09.pdf,
10 -
11 -II. OBSERVATION NUMBER TWO: THE … to that result?97
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-04-14 00:37:26.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -80
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -6
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Stuyvesant Fennell Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -JANFEB - DA - Hate Speech
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Caselist.CitesClass[108]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,20 +1,0 @@
1 -First is CP Text: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech except in the case of the nonconsensual distribution of sexually explicit images.
2 -
3 -Second is the DA:
4 -
5 -A. Uniqueness: The nonconsensual distribution of sexually explicit images is constitutionally protected speech – aff allows it on college campuses.
6 -
7 -Goldberg 16 – Bracketed for potentially offensive language Erica Goldberg Columbia Law Review Volume 116, No. 3 April 2016 "FREE SPEECH CONSEQUENTIALISM"
8 -States have begun …free speech regime.
9 -
10 -B. Link: CP solves – deters perpetrators and creates a cultural shift.
11 -
12 -Citron and Franks 14 Danielle Keats Citron, Mary Anne Franks. "CRIMINALIZING REVENGE PORN" 4/21/2014 https://www.law.yale.edu/system/files/area/center/isp/documents/danielle_citron_-_criminalizing_revenge_porn_-_fesc.pdf Danielle Keats Citron is a Lois K. Macht Research Professor and Professor of Law, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law; Affiliate Scholar, Stanford Center on Internet and Society; Affiliate Fellow, Yale Information Society Project. Mary Anne Franks is an Associate Professor of Law, University of Miami School of Law.
13 -
14 -As this discussion … porn site operators.
15 -
16 -C. Impact: Non-consensual image distribution causes chilling effect for survivors who are afraid to speak out and are silenced. Causes psychological violence.
17 -
18 -Citron and Franks 14 – Bracketed for potentially offensive language Danielle Keats Citron, Mary Anne Franks. "CRIMINALIZING REVENGE PORN" 4/21/2014 https://www.law.yale.edu/system/files/area/center/isp/documents/danielle_citron_-_criminalizing_revenge_porn_-_fesc.pdf Danielle Keats Citron is a Lois K. Macht Research Professor and Professor of Law, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law; Affiliate Scholar, Stanford Center on Internet and Society; Affiliate Fellow, Yale Information Society Project. Mary Anne Franks is an Associate Professor of Law, University of Miami School of Law.
19 -
20 -Victims’ fear can be …of sex discrimination.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-04-14 00:47:58.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -82
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -8
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Stuyvesant Fennell Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -JANFEB - CP - Nonconsensual sexually explicit image distribution v2
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Caselist.RoundClass[78]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -101,102
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-04-12 03:10:54.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
OpenSource
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Stuyvesant/Fennell+Neg/Stuyvesant-Fennell-Neg-Any-Round9.docx
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -9
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Caselist.RoundClass[79]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -103
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-04-14 00:11:44.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
OpenSource
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Stuyvesant/Fennell+Neg/Stuyvesant-Fennell-Neg-Any-Quarters.docx
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Quarters
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Caselist.RoundClass[80]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -104
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-04-14 00:37:23.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
OpenSource
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Stuyvesant/Fennell+Neg/Stuyvesant-Fennell-Neg-Any-Round6.docx
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -6
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Caselist.RoundClass[82]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -108
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-04-14 00:47:56.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
OpenSource
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Stuyvesant/Fennell+Neg/Stuyvesant-Fennell-Neg-Any-Round8.docx
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -8
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Caselist.RoundClass[87]
OpenSource
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Stuyvesant/Fennell+Neg/Stuyvesant-Fennell-Neg-Harrison%20RR-Round2.docx
Caselist.CitesClass[116]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,20 @@
1 +Epistemology comes first because labeling things moral or immoral is just a function of knowledge. We need to know how we know what right and wrong are before we can pick the best definition. A priori reasoning is impossible so the only epistemologically sound basis for morality is experience.
2 +
3 +Schwartz 09 “A Defense of Naïve Empiricism: It is Neither Self-Refuting Nor Dogmatic.” Stephen P. Schwartz. Ithaca College. pp.1-14.
4 + The empirical support …an empirical claim.
5 +
6 +All humans experience the badness of pain and the goodness of pleasure.
7 +
8 +Nagel Thomas Nagel, The View From Nowhere, HUP, 1986: 156-168.
9 +I shall defend … the appearances here.
10 +
11 +Thus, because each agent values their own pleasure, they must also value the pleasure of others.
12 +
13 +Sayre-McCord Geoffrey Sayre-McCord "Mill's "Proof" of the Principle of Utility: A More than Half-Hearted Defense" volume 18, number 2 Spring 2001, 330-360. www.unc.edu/~gsmunc/phil22/Mill's_Proof.pdf
14 +According to the … of all the rest.
15 +
16 +Therefore, since we have no non-arbitrary reason to value our own pleasure over the pleasure of others, the standard is maximizing expected wellbeing. Prefer additionally:
17 +
18 +1. Topic Education – Util forces debates about what actually happens in the real world because we have to use empirics and analyze the consequences of the plan versus neg advocacy. This increases topic education because it forces research on the effects of the resolution and thus learn more about the topic. Topic education is key to education because we use it in the real-world to talk about current topics.
19 +
20 +2. Exclusion – Util is the least exclusive because (a) it’s the easiest to understand: most net benefits equals a win (b) it doesn’t require access to private sites such as jstor and (c) it’s largely influenced by weighing, which is unconstrained by resources. Exclusion comes first as we ought to maximize opportunities for people to join the activity before we can debate about their experience. Exclusion outweighs because people need to be in debate to get any benefits from it.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-04-16 13:49:28.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +88
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +9
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Stuyvesant Fennell Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +FW - Util
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Caselist.CitesClass[117]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,4 @@
1 +Use epistemic modesty to account for the nonzero chance that you are wrong on the framework debate. That’s probability of the moral framework being true multiplied by the value of an action under that framework
2 +
3 +Christensen 13 David Christensen, Professor of Philosophy @ Brown University, “Epistemic Modesty Defended”. The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays, edited by David Christensen and Jennifer Lackey, Oxford University Press, 2013
4 +One might, of …epistemic modesty entirely.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-04-16 13:49:30.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +88
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +9
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Stuyvesant Fennell Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +FW - Epistemic Modesty
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Caselist.CitesClass[118]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,20 @@
1 +First is CP Text: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech except in the case of the nonconsensual distribution of sexually explicit images.
2 +
3 +Second is the DA:
4 +
5 +A. Uniqueness: The nonconsensual distribution of sexually explicit images is constitutionally protected speech – aff allows it on college campuses.
6 +
7 +Goldberg 16 – Bracketed for potentially offensive language Erica Goldberg Columbia Law Review Volume 116, No. 3 April 2016 "FREE SPEECH CONSEQUENTIALISM"
8 +States have begun …free speech regime.
9 +
10 +B. Link: CP solves – deters perpetrators and creates a cultural shift.
11 +
12 +Citron and Franks 14 Danielle Keats Citron, Mary Anne Franks. "CRIMINALIZING REVENGE PORN" 4/21/2014 https://www.law.yale.edu/system/files/area/center/isp/documents/danielle_citron_-_criminalizing_revenge_porn_-_fesc.pdf Danielle Keats Citron is a Lois K. Macht Research Professor and Professor of Law, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law; Affiliate Scholar, Stanford Center on Internet and Society; Affiliate Fellow, Yale Information Society Project. Mary Anne Franks is an Associate Professor of Law, University of Miami School of Law.
13 +
14 +As this discussion … porn site operators.
15 +
16 +C. Impact: Non-consensual image distribution causes chilling effect for survivors who are afraid to speak out and are silenced. Causes psychological violence.
17 +
18 +Citron and Franks 14 – Bracketed for potentially offensive language Danielle Keats Citron, Mary Anne Franks. "CRIMINALIZING REVENGE PORN" 4/21/2014 https://www.law.yale.edu/system/files/area/center/isp/documents/danielle_citron_-_criminalizing_revenge_porn_-_fesc.pdf Danielle Keats Citron is a Lois K. Macht Research Professor and Professor of Law, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law; Affiliate Scholar, Stanford Center on Internet and Society; Affiliate Fellow, Yale Information Society Project. Mary Anne Franks is an Associate Professor of Law, University of Miami School of Law.
19 +
20 +Victims’ fear can be …of sex discrimination.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-04-16 13:50:08.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +89
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +8
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Stuyvesant Fennell Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +JANFEB - CP - Nonconsensual sexually explicit image distribution v2
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Caselist.CitesClass[119]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,13 @@
1 +The standard is combatting material inequalities. This is the most epistemologically sound starting point for moral decisions.
2 +
3 +Mills 05, Charles, 2005, Ideal Theory” as Ideology,
4 +
5 +The crucial common …male-dominated philosophical literature.
6 +
7 +3 implications:
8 +
9 +First, only non-ideal theory is inclusive of all perspectives, increasing the probability that ethical deliberation can come to sound conclusions since exclusion of voices leads to privileged views of ethics that become ivory tower.
10 +
11 +Second, only this framework is motivating: oppressed groups cant participate in the aff framework which means they cant be compelled to action. That’s a prerequisite to ethics - if no one can adopt a theory it has no use.
12 +
13 +Third, non-ideal theory necessitates consequentialism since instead of following rules that assume an already equal playing field, we take steps to correct the material injustice. This means that the MOST important impacts in this debate are the lives of materially oppressed people living in the status quo.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-04-16 13:51:02.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +90
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Quarters
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Stuyvesant Fennell Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +FW - Materiality
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Caselist.CitesClass[120]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,13 @@
1 +The standard is combatting material inequalities. This is the most epistemologically sound starting point for moral decisions.
2 +
3 +Mills 05, Charles, 2005, Ideal Theory” as Ideology,
4 +
5 +The crucial common …male-dominated philosophical literature.
6 +
7 +3 implications:
8 +
9 +First, only non-ideal theory is inclusive of all perspectives, increasing the probability that ethical deliberation can come to sound conclusions since exclusion of voices leads to privileged views of ethics that become ivory tower.
10 +
11 +Second, only this framework is motivating: oppressed groups cant participate in the aff framework which means they cant be compelled to action. That’s a prerequisite to ethics - if no one can adopt a theory it has no use.
12 +
13 +Third, non-ideal theory necessitates consequentialism since instead of following rules that assume an already equal playing field, we take steps to correct the material injustice. This means that the MOST important impacts in this debate are the lives of materially oppressed people living in the status quo.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-04-16 13:51:11.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +91
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Quarters
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Stuyvesant Fennell Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +FW - Materiality
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Caselist.CitesClass[121]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,11 @@
1 +Voting aff increases the amount of hate speech –
2 +
3 +a. The plan legitimizes and legalizes hate speech which means people will take advantage of the lack of regulation and will start saying racist things because there is no fear of recourse and it is socially acceptable
4 +
5 +b. Your solvency relies on hate speech increasing – the only way counter speech works is if we know who the racists are because they say racist things out loud, which means double bind – either (a) hate speech doesn’t increase and your solvency is denied and you vote negative on presumption because you need to justify a shift from the squo or (b) your solvency is true, and you increase hate speech
6 +
7 +This causes psychological violence and internalized hatred. Even if speech codes don’t decrease hate speech, codes stop the impression that hate speech can go unpunished.
8 +
9 +Delgado and Stefacic 09, Richard Delgado - University Professor, Seattle University School of Law; J.D., 1974, University of California, Berkeley. Jean Stefancic – Research Professor, Seattle University School of Law; M.A., 1989, University of San Francisco. “FOUR OBSERVATIONS ABOUT HATE SPEECH.” WAKE FOREST LAW REVIEW. 2009. http://wakeforestlawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Delgado_LawReview_01.09.pdf,
10 +
11 +II. OBSERVATION NUMBER TWO: THE … to that result?97
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-04-16 13:51:41.751
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +92
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +6
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Stuyvesant Fennell Neg
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +JANFEB - DA - Hate Speech
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Caselist.RoundClass[88]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +116,117
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-04-16 13:49:25.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
OpenSource
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Stuyvesant/Fennell+Neg/Stuyvesant-Fennell-Neg-Any-Round9.docx
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +9
RoundReport
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,2 @@
1 +FW - Util
2 +FW - Epistemic Modesty
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Caselist.RoundClass[89]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +118
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-04-16 13:50:03.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
OpenSource
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Stuyvesant/Fennell+Neg/Stuyvesant-Fennell-Neg-Any-Round8.docx
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +8
RoundReport
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +CP - Nonconsensual image distribution
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Caselist.RoundClass[90]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +119
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-04-16 13:50:56.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
OpenSource
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Stuyvesant/Fennell+Neg/Stuyvesant-Fennell-Neg-Any-Quarters.docx
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Quarters
RoundReport
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +FW - Materiality
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Caselist.RoundClass[91]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +120
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-04-16 13:51:08.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
OpenSource
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Stuyvesant/Fennell+Neg/Stuyvesant-Fennell-Neg-Any-Quarters.docx
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Quarters
RoundReport
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +FW - Materiality
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Caselist.RoundClass[92]
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-04-16 13:51:38.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
OpenSource
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +https://hsld.debatecoaches.org/download/Stuyvesant/Fennell+Neg/Stuyvesant-Fennell-Neg-Any-Round6.docx
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +6
RoundReport
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +DA - Hate Speech
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Any

Schools

Aberdeen Central (SD)
Acton-Boxborough (MA)
Albany (CA)
Albuquerque Academy (NM)
Alief Taylor (TX)
American Heritage Boca Delray (FL)
American Heritage Plantation (FL)
Anderson (TX)
Annie Wright (WA)
Apple Valley (MN)
Appleton East (WI)
Arbor View (NV)
Arcadia (CA)
Archbishop Mitty (CA)
Ardrey Kell (NC)
Ashland (OR)
Athens (TX)
Bainbridge (WA)
Bakersfield (CA)
Barbers Hill (TX)
Barrington (IL)
BASIS Mesa (AZ)
BASIS Scottsdale (AZ)
BASIS Silicon (CA)
Beckman (CA)
Bellarmine (CA)
Benjamin Franklin (LA)
Benjamin N Cardozo (NY)
Bentonville (AR)
Bergen County (NJ)
Bettendorf (IA)
Bingham (UT)
Blue Valley Southwest (KS)
Brentwood (CA)
Brentwood Middle (CA)
Bridgewater-Raritan (NJ)
Bronx Science (NY)
Brophy College Prep (AZ)
Brown (KY)
Byram Hills (NY)
Byron Nelson (TX)
Cabot (AR)
Calhoun Homeschool (TX)
Cambridge Rindge (MA)
Canyon Crest (CA)
Canyon Springs (NV)
Cape Fear Academy (NC)
Carmel Valley Independent (CA)
Carpe Diem (NJ)
Cedar Park (TX)
Cedar Ridge (TX)
Centennial (ID)
Centennial (TX)
Center For Talented Youth (MD)
Cerritos (CA)
Chaminade (CA)
Chandler (AZ)
Chandler Prep (AZ)
Chaparral (AZ)
Charles E Smith (MD)
Cherokee (OK)
Christ Episcopal (LA)
Christopher Columbus (FL)
Cinco Ranch (TX)
Citrus Valley (CA)
Claremont (CA)
Clark (NV)
Clark (TX)
Clear Brook (TX)
Clements (TX)
Clovis North (CA)
College Prep (CA)
Collegiate (NY)
Colleyville Heritage (TX)
Concord Carlisle (MA)
Concordia Lutheran (TX)
Connally (TX)
Coral Glades (FL)
Coral Science (NV)
Coral Springs (FL)
Coppell (TX)
Copper Hills (UT)
Corona Del Sol (AZ)
Crandall (TX)
Crossroads (CA)
Cupertino (CA)
Cy-Fair (TX)
Cypress Bay (FL)
Cypress Falls (TX)
Cypress Lakes (TX)
Cypress Ridge (TX)
Cypress Springs (TX)
Cypress Woods (TX)
Dallastown (PA)
Davis (CA)
Delbarton (NJ)
Derby (KS)
Des Moines Roosevelt (IA)
Desert Vista (AZ)
Diamond Bar (CA)
Dobson (AZ)
Dougherty Valley (CA)
Dowling Catholic (IA)
Dripping Springs (TX)
Dulles (TX)
duPont Manual (KY)
Dwyer (FL)
Eagle (ID)
Eastside Catholic (WA)
Edgemont (NY)
Edina (MN)
Edmond North (OK)
Edmond Santa Fe (OK)
El Cerrito (CA)
Elkins (TX)
Enloe (NC)
Episcopal (TX)
Evanston (IL)
Evergreen Valley (CA)
Ferris (TX)
Flintridge Sacred Heart (CA)
Flower Mound (TX)
Fordham Prep (NY)
Fort Lauderdale (FL)
Fort Walton Beach (FL)
Freehold Township (NJ)
Fremont (NE)
Frontier (MO)
Gabrielino (CA)
Garland (TX)
George Ranch (TX)
Georgetown Day (DC)
Gig Harbor (WA)
Gilmour (OH)
Glenbrook South (IL)
Gonzaga Prep (WA)
Grand Junction (CO)
Grapevine (TX)
Green Valley (NV)
Greenhill (TX)
Guyer (TX)
Hamilton (AZ)
Hamilton (MT)
Harker (CA)
Harmony (TX)
Harrison (NY)
Harvard Westlake (CA)
Hawken (OH)
Head Royce (CA)
Hebron (TX)
Heights (MD)
Hendrick Hudson (NY)
Henry Grady (GA)
Highland (UT)
Highland (ID)
Hockaday (TX)
Holy Cross (LA)
Homewood Flossmoor (IL)
Hopkins (MN)
Houston Homeschool (TX)
Hunter College (NY)
Hutchinson (KS)
Immaculate Heart (CA)
Independent (All)
Interlake (WA)
Isidore Newman (LA)
Jack C Hays (TX)
James Bowie (TX)
Jefferson City (MO)
Jersey Village (TX)
John Marshall (CA)
Juan Diego (UT)
Jupiter (FL)
Kapaun Mount Carmel (KS)
Kamiak (WA)
Katy Taylor (TX)
Keller (TX)
Kempner (TX)
Kent Denver (CO)
King (FL)
Kingwood (TX)
Kinkaid (TX)
Klein (TX)
Klein Oak (TX)
Kudos College (CA)
La Canada (CA)
La Costa Canyon (CA)
La Jolla (CA)
La Reina (CA)
Lafayette (MO)
Lake Highland (FL)
Lake Travis (TX)
Lakeville North (MN)
Lakeville South (MN)
Lamar (TX)
LAMP (AL)
Law Magnet (TX)
Langham Creek (TX)
Lansing (KS)
LaSalle College (PA)
Lawrence Free State (KS)
Layton (UT)
Leland (CA)
Leucadia Independent (CA)
Lexington (MA)
Liberty Christian (TX)
Lincoln (OR)
Lincoln (NE)
Lincoln East (NE)
Lindale (TX)
Livingston (NJ)
Logan (UT)
Lone Peak (UT)
Los Altos (CA)
Los Osos (CA)
Lovejoy (TX)
Loyola (CA)
Loyola Blakefield (MA)
Lynbrook (CA)
Maeser Prep (UT)
Mannford (OK)
Marcus (TX)
Marlborough (CA)
McClintock (AZ)
McDowell (PA)
McNeil (TX)
Meadows (NV)
Memorial (TX)
Millard North (NE)
Millard South (NE)
Millard West (NE)
Millburn (NJ)
Milpitas (CA)
Miramonte (CA)
Mission San Jose (CA)
Monsignor Kelly (TX)
Monta Vista (CA)
Montclair Kimberley (NJ)
Montgomery (TX)
Monticello (NY)
Montville Township (NJ)
Morris Hills (NJ)
Mountain Brook (AL)
Mountain Pointe (AZ)
Mountain View (CA)
Mountain View (AZ)
Murphy Middle (TX)
NCSSM (NC)
New Orleans Jesuit (LA)
New Trier (IL)
Newark Science (NJ)
Newburgh Free Academy (NY)
Newport (WA)
North Allegheny (PA)
North Crowley (TX)
North Hollywood (CA)
Northland Christian (TX)
Northwood (CA)
Notre Dame (CA)
Nueva (CA)
Oak Hall (FL)
Oakwood (CA)
Okoboji (IA)
Oxbridge (FL)
Oxford (CA)
Pacific Ridge (CA)
Palm Beach Gardens (FL)
Palo Alto Independent (CA)
Palos Verdes Peninsula (CA)
Park Crossing (AL)
Peak to Peak (CO)
Pembroke Pines (FL)
Pennsbury (PA)
Phillips Academy Andover (MA)
Phoenix Country Day (AZ)
Pine Crest (FL)
Pingry (NJ)
Pittsburgh Central Catholic (PA)
Plano East (TX)
Polytechnic (CA)
Presentation (CA)
Princeton (NJ)
Prosper (TX)
Quarry Lane (CA)
Raisbeck-Aviation (WA)
Rancho Bernardo (CA)
Randolph (NJ)
Reagan (TX)
Richardson (TX)
Ridge (NJ)
Ridge Point (TX)
Riverside (SC)
Robert Vela (TX)
Rosemount (MN)
Roseville (MN)
Round Rock (TX)
Rowland Hall (UT)
Royse City (TX)
Ruston (LA)
Sacred Heart (MA)
Sacred Heart (MS)
Sage Hill (CA)
Sage Ridge (NV)
Salado (TX)
Salpointe Catholic (AZ)
Sammamish (WA)
San Dieguito (CA)
San Marino (CA)
SandHoke (NC)
Santa Monica (CA)
Sarasota (FL)
Saratoga (CA)
Scarsdale (NY)
Servite (CA)
Seven Lakes (TX)
Shawnee Mission East (KS)
Shawnee Mission Northwest (KS)
Shawnee Mission South (KS)
Shawnee Mission West (KS)
Sky View (UT)
Skyline (UT)
Smithson Valley (TX)
Southlake Carroll (TX)
Sprague (OR)
St Agnes (TX)
St Andrews (MS)
St Francis (CA)
St James (AL)
St Johns (TX)
St Louis Park (MN)
St Margarets (CA)
St Marys Hall (TX)
St Thomas (MN)
St Thomas (TX)
Stephen F Austin (TX)
Stoneman Douglas (FL)
Stony Point (TX)
Strake Jesuit (TX)
Stratford (TX)
Stratford Independent (CA)
Stuyvesant (NY)
Success Academy (NY)
Sunnyslope (AZ)
Sunset (OR)
Syosset (NY)
Tahoma (WA)
Talley (AZ)
Texas Academy of Math and Science (TX)
Thomas Jefferson (VA)
Thompkins (TX)
Timber Creek (FL)
Timothy Christian (NJ)
Tom C Clark (TX)
Tompkins (TX)
Torrey Pines (CA)
Travis (TX)
Trinity (KY)
Trinity Prep (FL)
Trinity Valley (TX)
Truman (PA)
Turlock (CA)
Union (OK)
Unionville (PA)
University High (CA)
University School (OH)
University (FL)
Upper Arlington (OH)
Upper Dublin (PA)
Valley (IA)
Valor Christian (CO)
Vashon (WA)
Ventura (CA)
Veritas Prep (AZ)
Vestavia Hills (AL)
Vincentian (PA)
Walla Walla (WA)
Walt Whitman (MD)
Warren (TX)
Wenatchee (WA)
West (UT)
West Ranch (CA)
Westford (MA)
Westlake (TX)
Westview (OR)
Westwood (TX)
Whitefish Bay (WI)
Whitney (CA)
Wilson (DC)
Winston Churchill (TX)
Winter Springs (FL)
Woodlands (TX)
Woodlands College Park (TX)
Wren (SC)
Yucca Valley (CA)