| ... |
... |
@@ -1,14
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-The 1AC’s orientation towards futurity is a political stance in structural and ontological opposition to the queer – attempts at political assimilation merely displace queerness onto others. Only oppositional resistance to the enslavement of the future can contest infinite anti-queer violence |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-Edelman 4 Lee Edelman, Professor of English Tufts University, “NO FUTURE: Queer Theory and the Death Drive” Duke University Press, Durham and London, 2004 |
| 4 |
|
-By denying our … future stop here. |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-Futurism maintains itself by constantly creating new threats that risk destroying it in order to uphold the system itself – this creates real violence against the queer body in the name of saving humanity |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
-Edelman 04 |
| 9 |
|
-On October 12…that sinthomosexuality names. |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-The alternative is to embrace queer negativity in opposition to futurity and of the Child as the emblem of politics – only this act can contest infinite anti-queer violence which exceeds the calculability of the political |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-Edelman 04 |
| 14 |
|
-To make such …lived as history. |