Changes for page Stuyvesant Fennell Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:41
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[86]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-04-14 14:10:21. 3941 +2017-04-14 14:10:21.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[113]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,13 @@ 1 +Interpretation: The aff must defend that all constitutionally protected speech in all venues ought not be restricted by public colleges or universities. To clarify, they can’t defend removing a specific restriction on speech. 2 + 3 +Counterplans that place restrictions on only specific types of speech but eliminate all others are theoretically illegitimate. This means the neg cannot read PICs in the world of the interp. 4 + 5 +B. Violation: 6 + 7 +Net benefits: 8 + 9 +1. Legal Precision - Any means every 10 +Elder 91, David, “Any and All": To Use Or Not To Use?,” 1991, http://www.michbar.org/file/generalinfo/plainenglish/pdfs/91_oct.pdf 11 +The Michigan Supreme … Harrington v InterState Men's Accident Ass'n, supra) 12 + 13 +2. Limits - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-14 14:10:23.345 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jenn Melin, Rodrigo Paramo, Nathan Johnston - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +HWL IP - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +86 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Doubles - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stuyvesant Fennell Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB - T - Any - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Emory