| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,19 @@ |
|
1 |
+Prescriptive “ought” statements can’t exist in a world framed by white supremacy. |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Curry 13 PhD in Associate Professor of Philosophy, Africana Studies, Texas A and M University “In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical” 2013. |
|
4 |
+Ought implies a…idea of ethics. |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+Abstract ethics necessitates a view from nowhere which allows whiteness to take position of the norm. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+Yancy 08 Professor of Philosophy Duquesne University “Black Bodies, White Gazes THE CONTINUING SIGNIFICANCE OF RACE" Journal of Speculative Philosophy 2008 |
|
9 |
+I write out … of human value" |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+And, pretending that anti-black agents are capable of moral action is abstraction that makes ethics impossible. Traditional ethics is an anti black system that only serves to re-entrench white supremacy. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+Curry 2 |
|
14 |
+Traditionally we have … our tyrannical epoch. |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+The alternative is to embrace antiethics – refusing to assign moral obligations to historically immoral entities. |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+Curry 3 |
|
19 |
+Anti-ethics; the call … conversations about racism. |