Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[2]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[2]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[2]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-02-18 19:05:19.421
	1	+2017-02-18 19:05:19.0

Caselist.CitesClass[2]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,32 @@
	1	+A. Interpretation: the affirmative must defend hypothetical implementation of the resolution by a topical actor. Public Colleges and Universities are defined by USLEGAL as:
	2	+USLegal Site that defines legal terms “Public College Law and Legal Definition.” USLegal.
	3	+Public college means AND a governmental source.”(42 USCS § 2000c)
	4	+
	5	+B. Violation:
	6	+
	7	+C. Standards:
	8	+
	9	+1 Limits
	10	+Only limited topics protect participants from research overload which materially affects our lives outside of round. HARRIS:
	11	+Scott Harris (Director of Debate at U Kansas, 2006 National Debate Coach of the Year, Vice President of the American Forensic Association, 2nd speaker at the NDT in 1981). “This ballot.” 5 April 2013. CEDA Forums. http://www.cedadebate.org/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4762.0;attach=1655
	12	+I understand that AND my everyday existence.
	13	+ANALYTICS
	14	+
	15	+2 Textuality:
	16	+Textual accuracy key:
	17	+A) ANALYTICS
	18	+B) pragmatic offense justifies changing the topic or it being bad that the topic is this one, not your counter interp. The topicality rule comes first. NEBEL:
	19	+Jake Nebel (PhD student at NYU, BPhil in philosophy from Oxford, 3 time TOC elim round participant, went 3-3 at the 2006 Florida Blue Key tournament). “The Priority of Resolutional Semantics.” VBriefly. 20 February 2015. JDN. http://vbriefly.com/2015/02/20/the-priority-of-resolutional-semantics-by-jake-nebel/
	20	+One reason why AND the argument above.
	21	+
	22	+3 TVA:
	23	+
	24	+4 Effects T:
	25	+
	26	+Vote on in-round competitive equity:
	27	+A) ANALYTICS
	28	+B) Violations of competitive equity prevent effective dialogue and participation. GALLOWAY:
	29	+Ryan Galloway 7, Samford Comm prof, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28, 2007
	30	+Debate as a AND time and power (Farrell, 1985, p. 114).
	31	+
	32	+Drop the debater – Substance Skewed

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-02-18 19:05:21.135

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Bob Overing

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Evanston HS

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Strake Jesuit Tom Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JF- Defend Resolutional Actor T

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harvard