| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,26 @@ |
|
1 |
+Interpretation: Debaters should read substantively justified frameworks grounded in a normative starting point to combat and understand oppression. Consistency with the best liberation strategy for the oppressed requires a debate where we explain what this oppression is, how we react to it, and why it’s the only relevant impact. To clarify, my argument is not oppression is ok but that debating the justifications is inescapable from solving oppression. |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Violation: |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+Net Benefits: |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+First, saying oppression is bad without normatively justifying it is insufficient. Connecting theory to the real world is key to produce social change. A non-reflective theory only reinforces stereotypes, turns their performance. SMITH AND EATON: |
|
8 |
+“Role of reflection and praxis in community-based learning and social justice work” by Toby Smith and Marie Eaton http://cielearn.org/wp-content/themes/ciel/docs/Praxis_Social20Justice202-10.pdf |
|
9 |
+“If reflection is AND and our lives. ” |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+Second, their use of educational spaces as a sites of empowerment places the judge into the role of the authoritarian adjudicator who molds students in accordance to a particular political end. This kills any conception of critical citizenship and turns their performance. RICKERT: |
|
12 |
+Rickert, Thomas. ""Hands Up, You're Free": Composition in a Post-Oedipal World." JacOnline Journal |
|
13 |
+“An example of AND produced in class.” (299-300) |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+Third, their unquestionable model to oppression that justifies itself through self-reference ensures a rigid vision of resistance where the judge prescribes the student an imperialist model of education – turns their performance. RICKERT 2: |
|
16 |
+Rickert, Thomas. ""Hands Up, You're Free": Composition in a Post-Oedipal World." JacOnline Journal |
|
17 |
+“This essay will AND serve the other” (48) |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+Rickert 1 and 2 Outweigh: |
|
20 |
+ANALYSIS |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+Fourth, philosophy is ABOUT social realities and teaches us how to address them. My framework claims are about to real world, not playing some academic game. This is a pre-fiat turn because they’re trying to suppress philosophical discussion while I say we should argue about the best framework. TRABER: |
|
23 |
+Becca Traber. Extremely lit person that knows stuff about debate. http://nsdupdate.com/2013/in-defense-of-philosophy-by-becca-traber/ |
|
24 |
+And, here is AND think about it. |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+Methods question so vote them down on prefiat level |