Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[23]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[30]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[23]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-11-20 18:50:45.606
	1	+2016-11-20 18:50:45.0

Caselist.CitesClass[30]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,17 @@
	1	+A is the interpretation: Debaters may not be extra topical
	2	+B is the violation:
	3	+The affirmative is extra-topical. Two warrants:
	4	+1. PART OF THE SOLVENCY COMES FROM CREATING THE ABILITY TO SUE POLICE UNDER THE ADA. AFFIRMING REQUIRES APPLYING THE ADA TO ARRESTS, AN APPROACH THAT NOT ALL COURTS SUPPORT. Auner 16
	5	+Thomas J. Auner (JD at Loyola Law), For the Protection of Society's Most Vulnerable, the ADA Should Apply to Arrests, 49 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 335 (2016)
	6	+Fortunately, courts began taking this disproportionate figure into account by providing mentally ill people with additional legal protections.5 In Sheehan v. City and County of San Francisco, 6 the Ninth Circuit held that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) applies to arrest situations involving mentally ill persons.7 The Ninth Circuit’s holding significantly furthers the other circuit courts’ momentum and fundamentally changes how police officers approach the mentally ill. However, not all circuits apply the ADA to arrest situations, leading to unequal federal protections for the mentally ill.
	7	+Implications: A) Analytic B) Analytic
	8	+2. This would require OVERRULING THE SHEEHAN DECISION which IS EXTRA TOPICAL. IT INVOLVES MORE THAN THE QUESTION OF QI. THE QUESTION IS ABOUT WHETHER POLICE HAVE TO MODIFY PROCEDURES FOR THOSE WITH DISABILITIES. ACLU 15
	9	+ACLU, 2/13/15, https://www.aclu.org/cases/city-and-county-san-francisco-v-sheehan, City and County San Francisco vs. Sheehan.
	10	+ Whether the ADA's requirement to make reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities applies to arrests and detentions. The question in this case is whether the police must modify their procedures, if feasible, when arresting and detaining persons with disabilities. The amicus brief submitted by the ACLU and leading disability rights organizations highlights the tragic consequences that too often follow when the police fail to make the reasonable accommodations required by the ADA. The brief also explains that standards adopted by many law enforcement agencies across the country demonstrate that both officer safety and public safety are enhanced when appropriate procedures are followed.
	11	+C. Extra T is a voter:
	12	+1. Ground.
	13	+2. Limits
	14	+3. Jurisdiction.
	15	+4. RVA
	16	+
	17	+Voters: Fairness, Jurisdiction, DTD, CI

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-11-20 18:50:47.49

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Leah Shapiro

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Brentwood JD

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+23

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+6

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Strake Jesuit Li Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+ND - Theory - ADA Extra T

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Glenbrooks