Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[5]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[5]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,16 +1,0 @@
1		-A) Interpretation: The aff must explicitly specify a comprehensive role of the ballot and clarify how the round will play out under that role of the ballot in the form of a delineated text in the 1AC. To clarify, the aff must:
2		-
3		-Clarify how offense links back to the role of the ballot, such as whether post-fiat offense or pre-fiat offense matters and which comes first.
4		-2. Clarify what theoretical objections do and do not link to the aff, such as whether or not the aff comes before theory.
5		-
6		-3. Clarify how to weigh and compare between competing advocacies i.e. whether the role of the ballot is solely determined by the flow or another method of engagement.
7		-
8		-B) Violation:
9		-
10		-C) Standards:
11		-
12		-Engagement
13		-a) Education
14		-b) Resolvability
15		-c) Link turns ROB
16		-CI. Drop Debater. No RVI

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-10-15 17:15:30.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Srikar Pyda

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Westwood JA

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-3

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Strake Jesuit Li Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Theory - ROB Spec

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-St Marks