Changes for page Strake Jesuit Li Aff
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:40
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[34]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-04-06 18:26:31. 1661 +2017-04-06 18:26:31.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[34]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,18 @@ 1 +Here's some shells I might read 2 + 3 +1. Spec status of CP in NC itself 4 +2. Prioritize K vs T in NC itself 5 +3. NIBs Bad 6 +4. Conditional PICs bad 7 +5. PICs Bad (in spec context usually) 8 +6. Must have advocacy text 9 +7. Disclosure theory 10 +8. the negative must have one stable advocacy in which they outline all conpro speech restrictions and defend those restrictions unconditionally 11 +9. for any DA the neg reads about a type of conpro speech, they must disclose a cite indicating this is indeed conpro speech before the TOC 12 +10. the negative cannot brea k new PICs at TOC- they need to be on the wiki before hand 13 +the aff burden is to prove that words have no intrinsic harm and the negative burden is to prove that words have intrinsic harms. 14 +12. The negative cannot read a PIC unless their solvency advocate advocates the exact text of the PIC. 15 +13. Neg counterplans cannot defend getting rid of restrictions on constitutionally protected speech that is currently restricted. 16 +14. The negative must concede to the aff's paradigm choice in terms of how the judge should evaluate the debate. 17 + 18 +Obviously the interps will be more nuanced than this, but this is the general idea. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-06 18:26:32.398 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +34 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Triples - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Strake Jesuit Li Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 Possible Interps List - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All