| ... |
... |
@@ -1,13
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Here's some shells I might read |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-1. Spec status of CP or Alt in NC itself |
| 4 |
|
-2. Prioritize K vs T in NC itself |
| 5 |
|
-3. NIBs Bad |
| 6 |
|
-4. Conditional PICs bad |
| 7 |
|
-5. PICs Bad (in spec context usually) |
| 8 |
|
-6. Must have advocacy text |
| 9 |
|
-7. Disclosure theory |
| 10 |
|
-8. The negative must have one stable advocacy in which they outline all conpro speech restrictions and defend those restrictions unconditionally |
| 11 |
|
-9. The negative must disclose round reports including all past 2nrs on their wiki |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-Obviously the interps will be more nuanced than this, but this is the general idea. |